|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: From the BB I am losing PTBB/hand | |||
| I am making a profit (and am sure of that) |
   
|
1 | 3.57% |
| 0.00 - 0.05 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.05 - 0.10 |
  
|
4 | 14.29% |
| 0.10 - 0.15 |
  
|
6 | 21.43% |
| 0.15 - 0.20 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.20 - 0.25 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.25 - 0.30 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.30 - 0.35 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.35 - 0.40 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.40 - 0.45 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.45-0.50 |
|
0 | 0% |
| results only |
|
7 | 25.00% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#664
01-21-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I haven't been keeping a tabs on the refs for the game, but that was a horrendous job on their part on that series. [/ QUOTE ]why? YOu have read everyone's posts which have explained that faceguarding is indeed a PI penalty even if you don't touch the guy, right? [/ QUOTE ] From Mike Periera: [ QUOTE ] There is no such thing as face-guarding in the National Football League. It is legal to face-guard a receiver. In order to have pass interference you must have contact. Any act without contact is not considered a foul. [/ QUOTE ] 
|
|
#665
01-21-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
Dungy's plan is to keep the defense fresh [/ QUOTE ] LOL [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#667
01-21-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
80 yard returnaments.
Klecko and Peyton scoring first two TDaments
|
|
#668
01-21-2007, 10:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
check out Q3...has the rule changed since then? http://www.nfl.com/fans/rulesschool120501.html [/ QUOTE ] Just so the actual language is in the thread: There is no such thing as face-guarding in the National Football League. It is legal to face-guard a receiver. In order to have pass interference you must have contact. Any act without contact is not considered a foul.
|
|
#669
01-21-2007, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I haven't been keeping a tabs on the refs for the game, but that was a horrendous job on their part on that series. [/ QUOTE ]why? YOu have read everyone's posts which have explained that faceguarding is indeed a PI penalty even if you don't touch the guy, right? [/ QUOTE ] From Mike Periera: [ QUOTE ] There is no such thing as face-guarding in the National Football League. It is legal to face-guard a receiver. In order to have pass interference you must have contact. Any act without contact is not considered a foul. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] That was in 2001. My question is has the rule changed since then?
|
|
#670
01-21-2007, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I haven't been keeping a tabs on the refs for the game, but that was a horrendous job on their part on that series. [/ QUOTE ]why? YOu have read everyone's posts which have explained that faceguarding is indeed a PI penalty even if you don't touch the guy, right? [/ QUOTE ] From Mike Periera: [ QUOTE ] There is no such thing as face-guarding in the National Football League. It is legal to face-guard a receiver. In order to have pass interference you must have contact. Any act without contact is not considered a foul. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ]Yes, I saw the post a few up from yours. My point was that instead of just saying how bad the refs are, we should be discussing what the rule actually is first.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
