|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Group One: 1 vs 9 | |||
| Sin City |
   
|
113 | 86.92% |
| Batman (1966 version w/ Adam West) |
  
|
17 | 13.08% |
| Voters: 130. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#622
06-08-2007, 10:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
I run ~17/12 average, but I also have a relatively small sample. Also, I've only played about 3k hands on PS (for $200 in bonii), the rest is on FTP, so that's why you don't have any hands on me.
|
|
#623
06-08-2007, 10:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
[ QUOTE ]
so pboy. 1 million is the new 100k? [/ QUOTE ] As you play more hands, your expected deviation from your expectation is going to go up $ wise BUT also as you play more hands your $ earned is going to continuously get larger in proportion to your SD. 100,000 hands is definitely a drop in the bucket and 1,000,000 hands you can still be +/- quite a bit from your expectation. I recommend we all play 10,000,000 hands before considering winrates, etc. from now on.
|
|
#624
06-08-2007, 10:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
[ QUOTE ]
but I also have a relatively small sample. [/ QUOTE ] How small? IIRC it doesn't really take too much to determine SD. It takes much, much more to determine WR.
|
|
#626
06-08-2007, 10:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
[ QUOTE ]
I recommend we all play 10,000,000 hands before considering winrates, etc. from now on. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds like a June iron man challenge to me. 450k hands/day, here I come.
|
|
#627
06-08-2007, 10:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] but I also have a relatively small sample. [/ QUOTE ] How small? IIRC it doesn't really take too much to determine SD. It takes much, much more to determine WR. [/ QUOTE ] 52k at 100NL FR
|
|
#630
06-08-2007, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ** Official June Chat Thread: The Flush **
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Hopefully MTTR can answer this one. But anybody feel free to chime in.  There was a stink a while back in one of the forums where a poster pointed out that Pokertracker actually counts the SD wrong. Do you remember where that was or if it ever got resolved? [/ QUOTE ] from what I recall, pt calculates standard deviation by looking at the standard deviation per session it will understate the deviation for those that play longer session and overstate it for those that play shorter ones I haven't looked into it for awhile, but I think that is what happens. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
