|
|
#611
04-10-2006, 04:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
I emailed them and got a nice, personalized response within an hour. I don't know why people are bashing them. [/ QUOTE ] Same here. E-mailed about adding SH NL tables. Got a reply almost right away. (Said their programmers are working on it.) 
|
|
#612
04-10-2006, 04:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I emailed them and got a nice, personalized response within an hour. I don't know why people are bashing them. [/ QUOTE ] Same here. E-mailed about adding SH NL tables. Got a reply almost right away. (Said their programmers are working on it.) [/ QUOTE ] Same here. I've gotten quick responses from all my emails.... even when the live response was tied up from all the people complaining about their rake.
|
|
#613
04-10-2006, 05:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
why is the "poker players alliance" not endorsing the rake free concept. do they not stand for players' rights or are they just a "puppet" organization of party.
to all those poker sites out there.....WE DEMAND LOWER RAKE, NOW!!!!
|
|
#614
04-10-2006, 06:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
why is the "poker players alliance" not endorsing the rake free concept. do they not stand for players' rights or are they just a "puppet" organization of party. to all those poker sites out there.....WE DEMAND LOWER RAKE, NOW!!!! [/ QUOTE ] This is a joke right? The PPA is acting in the interests of its contributors. I'm guessing that the sites kick in more than individual poker players.
|
|
#615
04-10-2006, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'm sure there are still bots on the site. [/ QUOTE ] No, you aren't. You have an opinion that there are. An opinion that is retarded. [/ QUOTE ] what is up with people's reading skills lately. Don't take that sentence out of context. It is implied as an opinion, and I'm sure most people saw it that way. Getit? get it? Maybe not so I'll rewrite the sentence. I have to think most people saw it that way. In seriousness however, it is very stupid to think that out of 1200 players there is not one or two bots on the site. That is a stupid opinion.
|
|
#616
04-10-2006, 06:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm sure there are still bots on the site. [/ QUOTE ] No, you aren't. You have an opinion that there are. An opinion that is retarded. [/ QUOTE ] what is up with people's reading skills lately. Don't take that sentence out of context. It is implied as an opinion, and I'm sure most people saw it that way. Getit? get it? Maybe not so I'll rewrite the sentence. I have to think most people saw it that way. In seriousness however, it is very stupid to think that out of 1200 players there is not one or two bots on the site. That is a stupid opinion. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, you stated you played with a confirmed bot for two days! If it was confirmed, then how could it just be your opinion? Jeez.
|
|
#617
04-10-2006, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'm sure there are still bots on the site. [/ QUOTE ] No, you aren't. You have an opinion that there are. An opinion that is retarded. [/ QUOTE ] what is up with people's reading skills lately. Don't take that sentence out of context. It is implied as an opinion, and I'm sure most people saw it that way. Getit? get it? Maybe not so I'll rewrite the sentence. I have to think most people saw it that way. In seriousness however, it is very stupid to think that out of 1200 players there is not one or two bots on the site. That is a stupid opinion. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, you stated you played with a confirmed bot for two days! If it was confirmed, then how could it just be your opinion? Jeez. [/ QUOTE ] Go back to 3rd grade before you decide to discuss these issues. I did play with a bot. The conversation you quoted has absolutely nothing to do with that. Also, your sentence here, has absolutely nothing to do with the quote above it. JEEZ indeed. I'll try at a 2nd grade level though, just in case you are interested. I played with a bot as did others(not an opinion). I assume there are still bots on the site(opinion). continue on with your sorry attempts at wit however. I'm sure there are some people who find them amusing. Oh wait a minute I have to rewrite that. I guess there might be some people who find them amusing.
|
|
#618
04-10-2006, 07:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know if wsex owned the bots as I only played with a confirmed bot for 2 days. [/ QUOTE ] So why did you state you played with a "confirmed" bot if it was just your opinion? Quit making total BS statements of fact if you don't want people to question your 'opinions'.
|
|
#619
04-10-2006, 08:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Why does LRR indicates bots?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't know if wsex owned the bots as I only played with a confirmed bot for 2 days. [/ QUOTE ] So why did you state you played with a "confirmed" bot if it was just your opinion? [/ QUOTE ] You are an idiot. I played with a bot that I and another player were tracking over a 24 hour period. The player was a bot. That is not bs. It is not an opinion. I think you are confusing yourself because you think that someone stating a fact means you can't question the veracity of said fact. You can do this though. It doesn't have to be an opinion for you to be able to do that. Don't worry though. There are alot of other confused and clueless people on the forums. [ QUOTE ] Quit making total BS statements of fact if you don't want people to question your 'opinions'. [/ QUOTE ] The funny thing here is, that you have never ever ever questioned me on the issue of the bot. You have just made stupid pointless comments that make no sense or are derived by your baseless opinions. If anything I enjoy discussing issues that are prevalent to poker or the sites that I play on so I would actually appreciate my posts being questioned. Like I said before though, you have never done this. The bot issue is an old issue anyways. The topic was done over 15 pages and 5 days ago. Any of the posters that cared have gotten what they could from the discussions and left it at that. The only reason it is the subject now is because there are a scattered few monkeys shouting sarcasms and insults and witless jokes that have nothing to do with the real topic. You are one of them.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
