|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: do you think this internet bill will be effective? | |||
| yes |
   
|
32 | 29.09% |
| no |
  
|
51 | 46.36% |
| maybe but not sure |
  
|
27 | 24.55% |
| Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#592
10-29-2007, 06:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
i want that fking #1 pick [/ QUOTE ] why? 
|
|
#594
10-29-2007, 06:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i want that fking #1 pick [/ QUOTE ] why? [/ QUOTE ] what the hell kind of question is that? the jets are clearly going to have a top 10 pick, so why not aim for the highest? good god thats the dumbest question ive ever seen in my life
|
|
#595
10-29-2007, 06:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
ease up guys, having that pick also has its burdens...
i know nothing of college football, but unless there is a clear cut star, it'll be hard to trade the pick for the plurality of picks we could use...not to mention the sick gauranteed money that pick gets
|
|
#596
10-29-2007, 06:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
ya i just want the jets get the exact player they want in the draft, i mean as long as they dont take a qb or rb which they prob wont, its not gonna be that bad of a hit to the salary cap
|
|
#597
10-29-2007, 07:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] i want that fking #1 pick [/ QUOTE ] why? [/ QUOTE ] what the hell kind of question is that? the jets are clearly going to have a top 10 pick, so why not aim for the highest? good god thats the dumbest question ive ever seen in my life [/ QUOTE ] LOOOOOOOOOOL Yeah pretty ridiculous to not want the best player in the draft.
|
|
#598
10-29-2007, 07:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
ease up guys, having that pick also has its burdens... i know nothing of college football, but unless there is a clear cut star, it'll be hard to trade the pick for the plurality of picks we could use...not to mention the sick gauranteed money that pick gets [/ QUOTE ] The Jets have the cap room. And we need to get A LOT better.
|
|
#599
10-29-2007, 08:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
i know we have the cap room, but did u see the deal the russell got from the raiders???? i know he's a QB, so his value is bit higher, but that was a sick contract...
also, while we have cap space now, we have people that need to be signed like rhodes, cotchery, mangold, dbrick, etc...money could dry up quick
|
|
#600
10-29-2007, 08:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *****The Official 2007 J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS THREAD******
[ QUOTE ]
ease up guys, having that pick also has its burdens... i know nothing of college football, but unless there is a clear cut star, it'll be hard to trade the pick for the plurality of picks we could use...not to mention the sick gauranteed money that pick gets [/ QUOTE ] Trading the first pick has got to be nearly impossible in today's NFL. Just two years ago there were 4 "can't miss" players in the draft(D'Brick, Bush, Leinert, Young). Houston couldn't bait one team to take that pick. I'm with Suigin here, unless the Jets really must have a Glen Dorsey, Chris Long, or Darren McFadden then I just don't see the necessity at having the #1 pick. I feel like any 3 of those guys could help the Jets tremendously and the #3 pick for monetary reasons would help more if you consider all 3 of those equal. Now if you think one is head and shoulders better and you must have them, then the #1 pick is for you.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
