![]() |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that it's in Stars best interest to have Lee or someone else reply to this thread and explain
a) why they thought she was a bot, b) what they are doing to ensure that other players are not falsely identified as bots, c) why it is that when they thought she was a bot, they let her cash her money out (after all, they thought that she was cheating). |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
Funny reply form Jeff. Didn't he previously state that there were several sessions that were of considerable lenght? I'm guessing there was only one instance where the mistake was made and he just added the several in there to convince your mom and most likely himself, that a bot was running. I would even ponder that there was no 43 hour session at all, and that it was a complete fabrication made so he could have something to say to Mom, and Lee regarding the suspicious activity.
Actually that is my guess. Jeff noticed mom playing super suspiciously(always acting in turn, making quick decisions, probably never chatting, no opponent profiling) and was convinced she was a bot. He then banned the account, and let her cash out. After when he was asked to provide evidence he just made up the 43 hour session baloney. There was one email were he stated that mom was allowed to cash out because there was still a chance she might not be a bot. But if they had a continuous 43 hour session in the books, where would the doubt be? Even a meth head would stop every now and then to piss and cut up more meth. Actually I don't think a meth head would be able to glue himself to chair, m aking it even more bogus. |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
ColdCaller=biggest nit ever [/ QUOTE ] There's a difference between being a nit and being factually accurate. I avoided slandering Teddy because his integrity is not in question here, just the side of the story. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Teddy,
I stated that Pokerstars did the right thing, closing your mom's account. Well I was wrong. Stars messed up and you did a great job in setting them straight. Kudoo's to u and ur mom! |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yep, I also implied this was a prank. Apologies.
|
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Excellent news. Except for the part where I won't have to check out her computer now. [/ QUOTE ] Fyodor, Why don't you get Teddy's permission to ask his mother out. (assuming she is not attached) I think it would be the gentlemanly thing to do at this point and what an ending to this story--True Love Blooms! |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think he's not telling the whole truth.
teddy was telling the truth. so you were wrong. If he posts the emails in full with the disclosed evidence, then we'll be a lot closer to seeing the truth. he was posting them when they were available to him. people kept requesting them but he didnt have them. If I'm wrong about him not telling the whole story, then I'll gladly eat crow, but I would be willing to bet $10,000 that I'm not. yes. you were wrong. he told everything he knew. and then you say "congratulations (i guess?)". nice swipe. youre fast to accuse others of being wrong but i guess you have a difficult time admitting when youre wrong. bwana |
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
GrannyMae really comes off looking like Joseph [censored] McCarthy in that thread. Granny, your schtick is so old...we get it. everyone is a cheater no matter what.
I'm just sad I had to take you off ignore to read your accusatory drivel. |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is "eating crow" like saying "I'm sorry if you were offended" is an actual apology. Which is to say, it isn't at all.
|
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
yes I will almost assure you that Granny ducks out of an apology as well
|
![]() |
|
|