![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: the best thing about having a g/f who has lots of hot friends is.. | |||
| they sit on your toilet seat |
|
94 | 60.26% |
| you sit on their toilet seat |
|
62 | 39.74% |
| Voters: 156. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#51
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] fwiw i have been told that FGators is only 13 years old. [/ QUOTE ] would actually make a lot of sense [/ QUOTE ] Yes. Yes, it would. |
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
|
the classics never get old
oh yeah here's a good one: [ QUOTE ] Okay so i looked at my pt database and saw a hand where i stacked FGators (bad beat obv) and decided to look back at this thread. The hand where i stacked him is in this thread but its changed a bit wtf? In my pt database heres the hand: POKERSTARS GAME #7093844054: HOLD'EM NO LIMIT ($1/$2) - 2006/11/19 - 20:18:27 (ET) Table 'Eduarda V' 6-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: RUDIKULOUS ($200 in chips) Seat 2: gusher 3 ($119.90 in chips) Seat 4: Rainstorm#01 ($129 in chips) Seat 5: FGators26 ($199 in chips) Rainstorm#01: posts small blind $1 FGators26: posts big blind $2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RUDIKULOUS [2d Ad] RUDIKULOUS: raises $6 to $8 gusher 3: folds Rainstorm#01: folds FGators26: raises $6 to $14 RUDIKULOUS: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [3c 4s 5d] FGators26: bets $22 Satans_Stare has returned RUDIKULOUS: raises $38 to $60 FGators26: raises $125 to $185 and is all-in RUDIKULOUS: calls $125 *** TURN *** [3c 4s 5d] [Ts] *** RIVER *** [3c 4s 5d Ts] [9d] *** SHOW DOWN *** FGators26: shows [4h 4d] (three of a kind, Fours) RUDIKULOUS: shows [2d Ad] (a straight, Ace to Five) RUDIKULOUS collected $397 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $399 | Rake $2 Board [3c 4s 5d Ts 9d] Seat 1: RUDIKULOUS showed [2d Ad] and won ($397) with a straight, Ace to Five Seat 2: gusher 3 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: Rainstorm#01 (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 5: FGators26 (big blind) showed [4h 4d] and lost with three of a kind, Fours according to him heres the hand: Dealt to FGators26 [4h 4d] RUDIKULOUS: raises $6 to $8 gusher 3: folds Rainstorm#01: folds FGators26: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [3c 4s 5d] FGators26: bets $22 Satans_Stare has returned RUDIKULOUS: raises $38 to $60 FGators26: raises $125 to $185 and is all-in RUDIKULOUS: calls $125 *** TURN *** [3c 4s 5d] [Ts] *** RIVER *** [3c 4s 5d Ts] [9d] *** SHOW DOWN *** FGators26: shows [4h 4d] (three of a kind, Fours) RUDIKULOUS: shows [2d Ad] (a straight, Ace to Five) how many of these has he doctored thats a bad beat on 2p2 ps if you change the g and a in fgators its fagtors LOLOMG [/ QUOTE ] from this thread |
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] ha ha ha - A++ is right as for mt2r - uhh why would you make this public, seriously, even if you thought that was true. |
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ] |
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] CHOO CHOO and its not close [/ QUOTE ] Also, ban OP for thread title almost causing life tilt in me? [/ QUOTE ] That was the point ldo. |
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined. BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me. VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame. METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY! It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income. [/ QUOTE ] monte carlo sim stats plz [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#57
|
|||
|
|||
|
If anything, the fact that FGators loses is an argument that Pokerstars ISN'T rigged.
|
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Fgators is unable to find a lawyer who accepts FPPs [/ QUOTE ] A+, first poll in ages I haven't instabastarded [/ QUOTE ] And it's correctly winning in a landslide. |
|
#59
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is FGators [censored] stupid? Maybe after he gets a job within the FBI he will shut down stars and gain one hundred million dollars. Muahmauahahahahmuahahah
|
|
#60
|
|||
|
|||
|
i got a belly laugh from both the op and that cartoon.
i love you, fgators. |
![]() |
|
|