|
|
#51
05-08-2007, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
[ QUOTE ]
steve, apologies on sounding harsh. I play on there enough that if it was that easy, no one would be concerned about it [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] No worries. I might try making myself play more HU, so it's definitely possible that my opinion will change as I get in more hands. 
|
|
#54
05-08-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
Melittafrau was the only player who I thought was a strong candidate. Seemed to have a very monochromatic approach at one point, but even he/she/it seemed to start making some adjustments.
When you guys are talking about HU, I assume you're talking about HU at the full tables. Is this right? Also, it would be beneficial to all not to pop off about the few legitimate action players there, even if they do have piscatorial leanings. At least one of them is known to read the 2+2 boards. For the record, for those of you who don't play there, hoppscot, bugstud, ggbman, tribefan and the rest of the 2+2 lineup are cold blooded TAG animals.
|
|
#55
05-08-2007, 07:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
[ QUOTE ]
Melittafrau was the only player who I thought was a strong candidate. Seemed to have a very monochromatic approach at one point, but even he/she/it seemed to start making some adjustments. When you guys are talking about HU, I assume you're talking about HU at the full tables. Is this right? Also, it would be beneficial to all not to pop off about the few legitimate action players there, even if they do have piscatorial leanings. At least one of them is known to read the 2+2 boards. For the record, for those of you who don't play there, hoppscot, bugstud, ggbman, tribefan and the rest of the 2+2 lineup are cold blooded TAG animals. [/ QUOTE ] melittafrau is not a bot. he is a spazz, but not a bot.
|
|
#56
05-08-2007, 07:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
[ QUOTE ]
melittafrau is not a bot. he is a spazz, but not a bot. [/ QUOTE ] I agree and that's why I'm not one to do a lot of bot speculation. I've even seen melittafrau chat. I don't look forward to the day he/she gets a decent connection. I understand the reasons why WPX would be a good spot for bots, but the games and player styles are so fluid that someone trying to program against that field would be quite a task. I've had to start putting dates on my notes due to the stylistic ranges of so many of the regulars.
|
|
#57
05-08-2007, 07:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
[ QUOTE ]
just got the supposed list of bots. i only play 30 60 and higher, but the ones that play those are pretty much awful so i dont care. [/ QUOTE ] are you yopapaya... just a guess
|
|
#58
05-08-2007, 07:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] just got the supposed list of bots. i only play 30 60 and higher, but the ones that play those are pretty much awful so i dont care. [/ QUOTE ] are you yopapaya... just a guess [/ QUOTE ] yopapaya has been slumming it recently and has been in some 20/40 games.
|
|
#59
05-08-2007, 08:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
hes been slumming it for a while, back from when he used to only play 100 200 mostly hu against axw, then he came down and eventually wouldnt even play me hu 50 100... made me feel good until MadCaddy, Reztez, and others destroyed me at 1-2.
nl is easy moniez these days
|
|
#60
05-08-2007, 11:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 10/20 6-max .. WPEX v Stars
i have played very little 20 40. i dont think i have for more than 3 sessions. you must be really keeping tabs on me. ive gotten much pickier about what games i sit in since the neteller [censored] went down. right after that, i lost 6 figures in a month sports betting, and i got stiffed from another sports book for 50k at the same time. still beat wpex pretty regularly though. i dont care if there are bots. the bots are terrible.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
