PP closed my account

[ohnonotthat]

but I don't think he plays as "GH." at Party.

He wanted someone to pat his head, tell him he's a good boy, and reassure him that he had nothing to worry about.

Kind of like when your girlfriend/wife asks if she looks like she's gaining weight.

If she asks it's because she has gained some - typically 2 or 3 lbs. - and wants you to say she still looks hot.

So, here goes.

GH., you still make me hot. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

- Maybe now we can move on.

[Petomane]

Let me get this straight - you both message each other while at the same table?
Doesn't matter what you discuss - that should NEVER be allowed.
And you've both won large amounts.
If I had a friend who played like I do, I'd avoid him at the tables altogether.

[StellarWind]

This forum is a kangaroo court. Don't know why you thought it would be helpful to post your problem here [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]. Many posters in this thread should be embarrassed by their behavior.

How many pairs of 8-tabling Party 15/30 players with the same affiliate have their accounts locked and under investigation at this exact moment? I'll give you three guesses and the first two don't count. Think about that before you post problems like this in the future.

In my opinion privately discussing reads during a session is unethical even if it never occurs during a hand. I think you should stop doing it. I'm not calling you a cheater or suggesting that this is grounds for Party to punish you.

Discussing sports, girls, or the weather over AIM while playing poker is not unethical. As for why anyone should trust you, well everyone has to trust me not to use my telephone too. You cannot verify that two players are not discussing hands online. It's simply impossible. There is no ethical difference between nonstop nonpoker discussions and no communication at all.

As a practical matter I would never use AIM while playing because I am afraid some snoopy poker room might draw the wrong conclusion and punish me.

I do agree with a sentiment implicitly expressed by many posters in this forum. Party is an extremely competent organization in every respect. There is no possibility that an innocent person could ever have their funds seized for colluding, use of banned software, or operating a bot. The software tools for detecting hanky-panky on your PC are part of their impeccably tested and bug-free poker client. As for the human aspect of the investigation, Party security procedures are rightfully secret, but we can draw the proper conclusions from the rest of the organization. I'm sure they only hire top-quality poker analysts and rigourously train them to follow carefully-developed industry-leading procedures.

[theRealMacoy]

[ QUOTE ]
Party is an extremely competent organization in every respect. There is no possibility that an innocent person could ever have their funds seized for colluding, use of banned software, or operating a bot. The software tools for detecting hanky-panky on your PC are part of their impeccably tested and bug-free poker client. As for the human aspect of the investigation, Party security procedures are rightfully secret, but we can draw the proper conclusions from the rest of the organization. I'm sure they only hire top-quality poker analysts and rigourously train them to follow carefully-developed industry-leading procedures.

[/ QUOTE ]


this was my favourite part...absolutely dripping

[Mike Haven]

Thread started by GH locked at GH's request.

In theory, there is no problem with someone else starting a related thread if they deem it to be necessary. MH.