|
|
#51
05-16-2006, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Adam Freidman...
[ QUOTE ]
You are comparing a 5k buy in to a $500 buy in. The 5k buy in, 9th got 12K, so everyone throwing in $500 wasnt asking for much. A short stack chiming in, in a $500 tourney asking that money be taken away from first just to pay 13th is quite different. If he had asked that each player throw in $40 to cover the buy in for the 13th place person, then it would be the same thing. Dont compare apples to oranges. [/ QUOTE ] I agree that the situations are different, but I was focusing on this paragraph: "I cannot think of a single decent tournament player in the world who would have done anything different from what Ken did. Having the chip lead while the tournament is “on the bubble” is a truly dominating position, and he would have been a fool to voluntarily give up that position by accepting the deal and removing the bubble. In fact, I would guess that he built his massive chip lead, at least in part, by correctly picking on the short stacks during the half-hour that the tournament was at 13 players. All he had to do was stay selectively aggressive while everyone else was struggling just to survive." If I have a chip lead, I am not making a save to play an extra place, and I am sure that many top pros would say the same thing. Why give up the +EV? 
|
|
#52
05-16-2006, 01:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adam Freidman...
If Freidman was one of the chip leaders, putting in $500 for 10th place finisher would be dumb. There are places to be nice to your fellow humans but fortunately the poker table is not one of those places.
|
|
#55
05-17-2006, 10:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Adam Freidman...
[ QUOTE ]
That Shawn Ostertag is no slouch either. 2nd place and 6th place right along there with Adam. [/ QUOTE ] Is he the leading money-winner (and final tables) at Caesars Indiana this year? Name sounds familiar.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
