|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: NLCS | |||
| Cards in 4 |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Cards in 5 |
  
|
1 | 6.25% |
| Cards in 6 |
  
|
3 | 18.75% |
| Cards in 7 |
  
|
3 | 18.75% |
| Mets in 4 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Mets in 5 |
  
|
6 | 37.50% |
| Mets in 6 |
|
2 | 12.50% |
| Mets in 7 |
|
1 | 6.25% |
| Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#561
09-11-2007, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
wow bluffthis is there anybody else you would like to get owned by today? just ask, we have lots of other mods who will be happy to run circles around you.
any time you want to back up all that talk with a survivor just let me know. |
|
#563
09-11-2007, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I disagree with Leaky. I've been reading OOT a lot more than I was 3-4 months ago. [/ QUOTE ] OOT has gotten a lot better since BBV4Life- all the highschoolers tend to hang out there instead. [/ QUOTE ] Agreed that it's a big improvement to have lots of those guys out of OOT. [/ QUOTE ] I guess I just have different tastes. Maybe I just got into it because it was funny at one time. Its less funny now. At one point I liked the mix of thoughtful posters and total hams. Now they are separate and the magic is gone for me. I guess its time to start cheating on OOT until it catches me and then I have to kill it to save the divorce settlement. [/ QUOTE ] I think the funny you're missing has mostly gone to the other communities, not BBV4L, though. I miss the good funny, but not the bad so-called funny. |
|
#564
09-11-2007, 09:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
[ QUOTE ]
wow bluffthis is there anybody else you would like to get owned by today? just ask, we have lots of other mods who will be happy to run circles around you. any time you want to back up all that talk with a survivor just let me know. [/ QUOTE ] You gotta admit your offer of the survival isnt close to answering what BT proposed. If behind the scenes you offered to do the "is NT a good mod,yes, no" type poll with the results deciding whether you stepped down or BT had his account retired then it would indeed be backing up the talk. Fwiw, i have no real opinion either way - ive enjoyed 2+2 a lot more since i got asked to stop spoiling the fun of OOT by pointing out most of the people were retards and shouldnt promote illegal stupidity. Anyone who dislikes OOT or its rules can vote with their feet i guess. |
|
#567
09-11-2007, 11:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
[ QUOTE ]
So bluffthis...are you planning on responding? Or is this friendly discussion ended? [/ QUOTE ] Respond to what? More of your unproven assertions? Pass. I feel guilty though because this is after all very serz bidness. |
|
#569
09-12-2007, 12:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
[ QUOTE ]
Respond to what? More of your unproven assertions? Pass. I feel guilty though because this is after all very serz bidness. [/ QUOTE ] That's funny. You're the one asserting NT is bad for 2+2 and GW is the one referencing traffic studies and anecdotal evidence of people who say they were driven out of OOT but still posting on 2+2. Just like your unproven assertions against me were shown to be equally ridiculous. But yeah, be the first to accuse the other of "unproven assertions" and declare victory. And then refer to the internets as serious business as a backhanded slap at your opponent, when you're the one starting the big hissy fit, yet again (like your serious business interrogation gone nowhere the other night). Both very standard plays -- the death throes of a poster being buried by his own arrogance. But I'm sure everyone will buy it, right? |
|
#570
09-12-2007, 12:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Pwning BluffTHIS! Thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So bluffthis...are you planning on responding? Or is this friendly discussion ended? [/ QUOTE ] Respond to what? More of your unproven assertions? Pass. I feel guilty though because this is after all very serz bidness. [/ QUOTE ] Bluff, if you are not sure what to respond to, here are a few possibilities: -whether or not my summary of your argument is what you mean [ QUOTE ] 1) NT is a bad mod 2) Having NT mod is analagous to refusing to sell a product to a certain subgroup of 2p2 3) NT continuing to modding is causing people to leave OOT 4) Causing people to leave OOT is a bad thing because they will leave 2p2 which is bad for 2p2 [/ QUOTE ] If this is what you mean, could you address the point that you use posters in this thread as "empirical evidence" of your conclusion that posters will leave 2p2 because of NT, when, in fact they are continuing to post on 2p2 in the bbv4l/el d/bbv/oot? Let me know if you need further clarification. gw |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
