Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: KQo
raise 38 71.70%
fold 11 20.75%
call 4 7.55%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #531  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:50 PM
nation nation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: actually grinding now
Posts: 6,242
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

i dont know who that brandonjoseph guy is for the record. i've only talked to chuck (who's reading the thread and is going to respond soon i think) so it could be one of the other guys.
Reply With Quote
  #532  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:50 PM
nation nation is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: actually grinding now
Posts: 6,242
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

yep, nlnut is chuck.
Reply With Quote
  #533  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:52 PM
Our House Our House is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USGamers
Posts: 18,414
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

Hi Chuck.
Reply With Quote
  #534  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:54 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

FWIW,
just about every post nlnut has made looks to deal with sweatshoping lots of FTP tables
Reply With Quote
  #535  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:54 PM
Mr_Donktastic Mr_Donktastic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: hu4rollz.com
Posts: 3,807
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

[ QUOTE ]
Nation,

Please confirm to the 2+2 community that I am full_tilting.

I am here to answer questions and defend myself and my friends who are being wrongfully accussed of using bots on FTP.

FTP suspended over 35 accounts I had assocaiations with (thru P2P xfers) and they exonerated all 35 of them. Why? Because we are not guilty of using BOTS at ANY time. Preflop, post flop....never

Full_tilting

[/ QUOTE ]

Why aren't you guys better at poker if you play so much?
Reply With Quote
  #536  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:54 PM
IRuleYouHard IRuleYouHard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MS Paint Forum.
Posts: 1,050
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

Dear Chuck:
Stop botting. kthx [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
(I have no idea whats going on)
Reply With Quote
  #537  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:54 PM
DWarrior DWarrior is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: stealing your food
Posts: 3,106
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nation,

Please get a picture of the setup with all persons sitting and playing their respective accounts. Faces can be blurred out.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thought about suggesting this too but they obv won't do it if they feel they have nothing to validate (i.e. don't care that they be judged wrongfully).

[/ QUOTE ]

What would this prove? Would seeing a lot of monitors help their case? Most likely not. Remember, a "bot master" would have the same setup.
Reply With Quote
  #538  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:55 PM
thirstyforwater thirstyforwater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 151
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

Hey chuck - who is one4thethumb?
Reply With Quote
  #539  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:56 PM
Tuco Tuco is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: get away from me bitch
Posts: 1,563
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

[ QUOTE ]
They would if a friend was being slandered all over the internet, and wasn't a previous 2+2 forum member. Like I said, I don't waste my life in chat rooms..

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, you're a tool and doing more harm than good to your friend.

Tuco.
Reply With Quote
  #540  
Old 05-09-2007, 09:57 PM
jalexand42 jalexand42 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Open Pushing my range
Posts: 1,139
Default Re: NL Bots on Full Tilt

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol at people saying that the numbers aren't close enough to be conclusive... they are nearly identical for every stat on every street.

as for the arguers of the 14.24 and 13.67 stats, this could easily be from the RNG dealing one bot AA-TT some small percentage more than the other over the sample. 100k is large but not large enough to smooth out all randomness in the game. These numbers are so close it's not even worth aguing about it...

[/ QUOTE ]

The VPIP #'s are well over 3 standard deviations apart. That isn't close or anything like it. Of course that doesn't proove anything and there could be other explanations, but I think a subtle difference in PF strategy is more likely than a bug in the RNG.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF, I'm rusty on my statistics, but are you going to tell me that a .5% difference in VPIP over 100,000 hands is 3 SD's? [censored], post your math.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.