Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #531  
Old 04-20-2007, 08:56 PM
slickss slickss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 665
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

NCAces, I'll try to answer your accusations.

If you had followed what I wrote in this thread, you'd know that I never claimed that a full ban against guns is feasible in USA. I wrote that I suspect that the conditions under which USA was founded - basically a bunch of Europeans committing genocide and stealing land - has made the Americans the gun loving people you are today.

The settlers took America from the natives with brute force, which was possible mainly because of British muskets. Furthermore, compared to the British, the Americans were a lot more accepting towards change and new technology - which later would make USA the super-power it is today. Following the patent system (of 1790) and other factors, the Americans made several significant improvements to the muskets. Examples are the smoke-less gunpowder and the cone-shaped hollow ammunition. Finally, around the Civil War, Americans invented the rifle (1850s). Meanwhile, Samuel Colt would invent the revolver.

Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not try to teach history here. I'm sure you can find factual errors in what I wrote (don't disappoint me, pvn!). My point is that significant weapons technology originate in USA, for the most part. It's your creation, and it has been a necessary tool in your creation of liberty and freedom. I live in America, and I've come to understand that the last thing I want to do is to mess with an American's "rights for freedom". Americans have a very unique society and a very unique relationship with weapons.

Because of this, I don't think USA will ever function without guns. To me, that's sad. Your death-by-gun-rates are very high, and I would say it is very likely that they will stay very high.
Reply With Quote
  #532  
Old 04-20-2007, 08:58 PM
slickss slickss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 665
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
I haven't bothered with any other marksman qualification regimes, though I doubt I would have much trouble with the handgun or shotgun series.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you still a member of the NRA? Why did you stop with this at 16?

I'm only asking because I'm curious, I'm not accusing you of anything (in case you thought so).
Reply With Quote
  #533  
Old 04-20-2007, 09:12 PM
ShakeZula06 ShakeZula06 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: On the train of thought
Posts: 5,848
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you're implying everyone having a gun leads to less verbal abuse/conflict in a society, you just don't know what you're talking about.

[/ QUOTE ]
switzerland disagrees with you.

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh, you sure love responding to my posts. It's not the guns that make them polite, it's the culture.

[/ QUOTE ]
I actually agree with you. Culture is a big factor in deciding crime rate and deaths from guns, likely bigger then gun control laws.

I mean we see Switzerland with really lax gun control laws and very low crime rates, and we see the exact opposite in gun control laws in Australia yet they also have very low crime rates.

There isn't a one size fits all solution, which is what makes the "OMG gun laws will cure everything" crowd so annoying.
Reply With Quote
  #534  
Old 04-20-2007, 10:29 PM
slickss slickss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 665
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
There isn't a one size fits all solution

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm tempted to go with this as the conclusion of this debate.
Reply With Quote
  #535  
Old 04-20-2007, 10:32 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I haven't bothered with any other marksman qualification regimes, though I doubt I would have much trouble with the handgun or shotgun series.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you still a member of the NRA? Why did you stop with this at 16?

I'm only asking because I'm curious, I'm not accusing you of anything (in case you thought so).

[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't a member of the NRA at the time; you don't have to be a member to qualify for their various marksman awards. I did most of my qualifying at summer camp.

I joined the NRA for one year when I was in my 20s. I didn't renew for a whole slew of reasons. Partly because the NRA has a large interest in keeping gun control discussion alive (if the issue goes away, so does most of their money).
Reply With Quote
  #536  
Old 04-20-2007, 11:09 PM
Shoe Shoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Follow me to riches!
Posts: 3,379
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

Great Article: Link
Reply With Quote
  #537  
Old 04-20-2007, 11:20 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
d we see the exact opposite in gun control laws in Australia yet they also have very low crime rates.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please update your information. Australia's crime rate has greatly increased after the gun ban.
Reply With Quote
  #538  
Old 04-20-2007, 11:59 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
d we see the exact opposite in gun control laws in Australia yet they also have very low crime rates.

[/ QUOTE ]

Please update your information. Australia's crime rate has greatly increased after the gun ban.

[/ QUOTE ]
Please provide the statistics to back up your lies. Thank you.

P.S. - here's mine. The guy buyback began in 1997.

http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/f...rdedCrime.html
Reply With Quote
  #539  
Old 04-21-2007, 12:05 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

[ QUOTE ]
Please provide the statistics to back up your lies. Thank you.

P.S. - here's mine. The guy buyback began in 1997.

http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/f...dCrime.html<br />
[/ QUOTE ]

ok, from the page you posted, here's a quote.

[ QUOTE ]
# The trend in the rate of recorded assault has shown a steady increase from 1996 to 2003.
# The trend in the rate of recorded sexual assault has displayed a steady and significant increase between 1996 and 2003.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #540  
Old 04-21-2007, 12:11 AM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Gun accidents? Guns are dangrous?

Um...all that information is in the graph. And assaults were increasing prior to 1995 at around the same rate.

I love how you left out the other stats and quoted that two that help your argument.

BTW, the gun buyback began in 1997 and took a while to complete - and undoubtedly even longer for supply effects to propagate down to criminal gun ownership and gun culture among youth.

Bottom line: your assertion that crime has greatly increased is flat out wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.