SSNL [cheese] thread: JULY (nc)

[ajmargarine]

Last nite I played for a bit on the Monster tables. I played 1037 hands. Normally, my rake counter would show that I paid about $103 in rake. Last nite I payed $165 in rake. I don't think it can be overcome folks unless you run hot.

[derosnec]

ouch. assume you play 50k hands a month, that's $62 x 50 = $3,100 in extra rake a month. holy [censored]

[dazraf69]

[ QUOTE ]
Last nite I played for a bit on the Monster tables. I played 1037 hands. Normally, my rake counter would show that I paid about $103 in rake. Last nite I payed $165 in rake. I don't think it can be overcome folks unless you run hot.

[/ QUOTE ]

AJ you been playing the Sit n Go's at party? Are the free rolls worth it

[ajmargarine]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Last nite I played for a bit on the Monster tables. I played 1037 hands. Normally, my rake counter would show that I paid about $103 in rake. Last nite I payed $165 in rake. I don't think it can be overcome folks unless you run hot.

[/ QUOTE ]

AJ you been playing the Sit n Go's at party? Are the free rolls worth it

[/ QUOTE ]

No, I haven't looked into those at all. I've been losing my coinflips on the bubble at Stars.

[cbloom]

I just looked at my data, this is what I see : At 200NL the normal rake is around $15/100 , Monster makes it about $20/100

That's beatable, that's 1.25 PTBB/100 , so if you're a 6 PTBB winner, it just takes that down, and extra fishyness could make that up. Obviously the situation is much worse at 100NL.

I need to hurry up and get to 400NL.

[kitaristi0]

I PWN DONKAMENTS

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
Last nite I played for a bit on the Monster tables. I played 1037 hands. Normally, my rake counter would show that I paid about $103 in rake. Last nite I payed $165 in rake. I don't think it can be overcome folks unless you run hot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Rake counter? Is that different than what PT displays?

Generated rake and the actual rake you pay are different, I believe. PT keeps track of the rake that you "pay" in pots you win, which is the important figure when calculating the differences in Monster rake.

[goofyballer]

For those of you that like playing deep-stacked: Some kind of bug in Party .5/1 PL lets you buy in for $1000, but only at monster tables.

[cbloom]

[ QUOTE ]
For those of you that like playing deep-stacked: Some kind of bug in Party .5/1 PL lets you buy in for $1000, but only at monster tables.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, that's awesome, I'll have to try some pot limit. I hope they don't fix that. Seems to only be at the $1 PL, not the higher or lower PL tables.

Unfortunately the Monster rake at the $1 level is just devastating.

[Mercman572]

I have the rake at about 4.3 PTBB/100 at 100NL 6max [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]