|
|
#41
03-16-2006, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] that's only a felony...life goes on (after ~12 years) [/ QUOTE ] Doesn't bankruptcy only screw you for 7 years? Not to mention that I think going to serious prison is probably going to be far worse than having no credit. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Plant a firearm in someone's carry-on bag before they enter the airport. [/ QUOTE ] that's only a felony...life goes on (after ~12 years) [/ QUOTE ] please learn to read 
|
|
#42
03-16-2006, 12:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
please learn to read [/ QUOTE ] So here's your quote, right? [ QUOTE ] destroy your credit? max out bogus credit cards? empty bank accounts electronically really the worst possible [censored] in today's world [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, my bad. You weren't talking about ruining people's credit at all.
|
|
#43
03-16-2006, 12:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] please learn to read [/ QUOTE ] So here's your quote, right? [ QUOTE ] destroy your credit? max out bogus credit cards? empty bank accounts electronically really the worst possible [censored] in today's world [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, my bad. You weren't talking about ruining people's credit at all. [/ QUOTE ] you are a dumba s s
|
|
#44
03-16-2006, 12:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
Hey fuckface, let me spell it out for you.
You say that ruining somebody's credit is the worst thing in today's modern world. You then say that after 12 years in prison, life goes on. My response was supposed to be pointing out those 12 years in prison are likely to be worse than the 7 years of bankruptcy that your "worst thing in the world" would lead to. Got it?
|
|
#45
03-16-2006, 12:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
Hey fuckface, let me spell it out for you. You say that ruining somebody's credit is the worst thing in today's modern world. You then say that after 12 years in prison, life goes on. My response was supposed to be pointing out those 12 years in prison are likely to be worse than the 7 years of bankruptcy that your "worst thing in the world" would lead to. Got it? [/ QUOTE ] <--------------------- 
|
|
#46
03-16-2006, 12:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
Hey fuckface, let me spell it out for you. You say that ruining somebody's credit is the worst thing in today's modern world. You then say that after 12 years in prison, life goes on. My response was supposed to be pointing out those 12 years in prison are likely to be worse than the 7 years of bankruptcy that your "worst thing in the world" would lead to. Got it? [/ QUOTE ] Dude, go back and read the post from Surf that you quoted originally. Then look at the post that he was quoting when he made the "12 years" comment. It doesn't have anything to do with someone's credit. Trust me.
|
|
#47
03-16-2006, 12:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
Are you planning on employing this strategy? Or is this another reason why great minds shouldn't be idle? [/ QUOTE ] I owe Matt some money and I think this is his not so subtle way of getting me to pay up.
|
|
#49
03-16-2006, 01:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
I believe he was pointing out that surf said that destroying someone's credit, etc. is the worst possible thing that could happen in today's world.
Gump was then responding to surf's response to me that prison isn't that bad. Gump conjectured that it would take 7 years to get a bankruptcy straightened out, while prison would be a hell-filled 12 years. Personally, I'd rather be broke than ass-raped.
|
|
#50
03-16-2006, 01:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Screwing Someone Over Spectacularly
[ QUOTE ]
Gump was then responding to surf's response to me that prison isn't that bad. Gump conjectured that it would take 7 years to get a bankruptcy straightened out, while prison would be a hell-filled 12 years. [/ QUOTE ] This is correct. The "life goes on" comment, taken in context, is pretty clearly trying to dismiss this particular scheme as less bad than ruining somebody's credit. My point was that 12 years in prison is going to be a lot worse for many people than 7 years of no credit. If my number 7 is wrong, oh well. You can make it pretty big and my point still stands. EDIT: Given that guaranteed bankruptcy was sort of the least that we were looking for here, and that ID theft can at least occasionally be sorted out, people going for that angle aren't being imaginative enough.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
