IWEARGOGGLES has a lot of class

[THAY3R]

[ QUOTE ]

he's a great father to all wafflecrushers

[/ QUOTE ]

We love you dad!

[LiveNow]

i think i'd steal as many blinds as fast as possible.... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[imabigdeal]

i seriously doubt he would have done this if he had been trying for his 1st aussie millions seat

[Ansky]

I would expect nothing less from Luke, and it is clearly the right move.

Respect.

[yellowjack]

[ QUOTE ]
I would expect nothing less from Luke, and it is clearly the right move.

Respect.

[/ QUOTE ]

so you're saying you would think less of him if he didn't do this? i wouldn't but then again i don't know him at all and you probably do.

[citanul]

luke is sick. and a good guy.

he should trade me one aussi package for one weekend of fashion advice, re: sweaters - ugly vs. not ugly, imo.

[ImsaKidd]

Am I the only one who expected this to be Goggles somehow not having class?

Regardless, I don't think im a good enough person to do this, but hats off to goggles.

[PokerAmateur4]

[ QUOTE ]
hats off to goggles.

[/ QUOTE ]

[shaniac]

[ QUOTE ]
I would expect nothing less from Luke, and it is clearly the right move.

Respect.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think it's nice, but actually probably a little too nice in the context of highstakes poker. I'm certainly not sure what I would do in his seat, and, in any case, I don't think the it's even vaguely unethical to take the guy's blinds, therefore I don't feel comfortable calling this "clearly the right move." I wouldn't want to see people called out for poor ethics if they opposite of what IWG did.

I wondered similarly to the poster who figured IWG wouldn't have done it if he had been playing for his first (not third) Aussie seat, and it's not a reflection on IWG at all, just on how one's mood/situation could determine his actions in this spot.

/ramble