|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: My best response: | |||
| "Jason, what I meant is that given that picture of you, and the cuteness of your baby, your wife must be very attractive, because it had to come from somewhere. Sorry for the confusion." |
   
|
9 | 50.00% |
| "Yeah, what can I say, I'm into redheads." |
  
|
9 | 50.00% |
| Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
09-28-2007, 12:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Forum downgrade ftw!
|
|
#42
09-28-2007, 12:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WTF is up with >1000
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] My sincere apologies to CMI for moving last thread. I hadn't noticed the new system and thought the thread was BBV4L nonsense for some reason. [/ QUOTE ] Mike, you got my awesome pole locked. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Please let me see your pole again. [/ QUOTE ] NSFW
|
|
#43
09-28-2007, 12:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Boro, this post is useless without regression [/ QUOTE ] Eyeball it wimp. 50+/-15 replies per 1000 views. R^2 of about 0.6. [/ QUOTE ] I ran the numbers. 49+/-10 replies per 1000 views. R^2 = 0.59. I must be getting old. [/ QUOTE ] Statistical nittery: Simple regression results are iffy here because you clearly don't have constant variance.
|
|
#44
09-28-2007, 12:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WTF is up with %1000
Only thread that views matter for is the Shana Hiatt (sp?) playboy thread.
|
|
#45
09-28-2007, 12:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: WTF is up with %1000
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Boro, this post is useless without regression [/ QUOTE ] Eyeball it wimp. 50+/-15 replies per 1000 views. R^2 of about 0.6. [/ QUOTE ] I ran the numbers. 49+/-10 replies per 1000 views. R^2 = 0.59. I must be getting old. [/ QUOTE ] Statistical nittery: Simple regression results are iffy here because you clearly don't have constant variance. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah but the top and bottom of the data look pretty linear so I rolled with it.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
