![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
but how many players lose 500k? [/ QUOTE ] Grimstarr ?? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] |
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
$texas
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You should take a look at some simulation graphs posted over in the MTT forum. There is very significant long-term variance swings even for high-volume online play. I was amazed when I saw those graphs. Unfortunately, can't find link right now. [/ QUOTE ] Pretty sure OP meant poker pros, not lottery players. [/ QUOTE ] The graphs weren't for MTT players specifically. The graphs were for indepedent trials with a specified edge, bet size, and bankroll. Nothing to do with the specific game being played. Could be chess, backgammon, blackjack, whatever. I really wish I could find the link to those graphs. Eye opening stuff. [/ QUOTE ] lol at chess variance. Guess that evens out after 100 games. |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like 5-6 from Waterloo
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
3.14159265
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
2,718,281,828
COSMIC |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Last year I made half a mil playing $4-180 players on stars.
With the help of the rakeback, of course. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
$texas [/ QUOTE ] Nice. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
i don't know how many but i know the number that could reasonably easily if they really had to and the number that actually do are massively different
|
![]() |
|
|