Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 07-25-2007, 02:55 AM
NoahSD NoahSD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,925
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

Pot it and call a shove for the reasons speed limit gave. Depending on metagame, I might just open shove here.

Edit: I don't know how much I wanna say about this.. but metagame in these spots is really interesting. With 2x the pot, you have the ability to force him to commit his whole stack when you only have to pay half of it. Abusing this well is difficult and subtle, but very profitable.

One of the things that separates the people making like 8-10 PTBB from those making less is their ability to recognize how stack sizes ACTUALLY affect a situation--as opposed to the sort of SSNL wisdom which just says when deep drawing hands are good and marginal hands are bad.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-25-2007, 03:10 AM
Wu36 Wu36 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: This is bliss
Posts: 1,270
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
wtf c/f the turn please (unless of course he is giving you direct odds)

[/ QUOTE ]
i think we can crai if he bets that small
<font color="white"> yeah i just felt like trolling</font>
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 07-25-2007, 03:14 AM
2Paul2 2Paul2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,698
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
Depends how lightly hes peeling the flop. If hes calling with less than an A a significant amount of the time or folds a weak Ace to a turn bet a significant amount of the time then betting is obviously best. Otherwise check/fold. This turn gets checked through and decent amount of the time though.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 07-25-2007, 03:17 AM
Fat Nicky Fat Nicky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: StartWeight-260, Current-238
Posts: 5,017
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

i would crai in this situation like, never. but if we know he's floating us, then isn't crai the best play here? this is assuming he's floating w/air (or a pocket pair &lt; A) and will try to take the pot away on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 07-25-2007, 04:31 AM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
Pot it and call a shove for the reasons speed limit gave. Depending on metagame, I might just open shove here.

Edit: I don't know how much I wanna say about this.. but metagame in these spots is really interesting. With 2x the pot, you have the ability to force him to commit his whole stack when you only have to pay half of it. Abusing this well is difficult and subtle, but very profitable.

One of the things that separates the people making like 8-10 PTBB from those making less is their ability to recognize how stack sizes ACTUALLY affect a situation--as opposed to the sort of SSNL wisdom which just says when deep drawing hands are good and marginal hands are bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, you can be in the samoleus school and call to fold river even with 2x pot left on turn.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 07-25-2007, 04:47 AM
Spy Dog Spy Dog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Beer tastes good
Posts: 5,193
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

If I feel that there is a good chance he is floating then I CRAI.

Otherwise, I check-call with odds and check-fold without odds.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 07-25-2007, 09:38 AM
Imrahil Imrahil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 7,500
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But guys, someone who is 38/28 doesn't seem capable of folding any A. CRAI would be bad because he'd call with any A right and he might fold an A to a bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

He'd fold an A if we bet but call a c/r with one?

Wait, what!?

This guy has a very wide range for calling the flop. Of course an A doesn't fold, but lots of other pairs do.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm saying a CRAI will never get him to fold an Ace because of the pot odds but he may fold a weak Ace to a second barrell. Pretty sure that makes sense.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 07-25-2007, 10:14 AM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Trying to be the shepherd
Posts: 18,437
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

This is the kind of ultra drawy board that hero is always betting the turn with 2 pair or a set so I like a bet, especially if hero has a decent tight image.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 07-25-2007, 10:39 AM
Poker_is_Hard Poker_is_Hard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bluffing into the Nuts
Posts: 661
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

[ QUOTE ]
Pot it and call a shove for the reasons speed limit gave. Depending on metagame, I might just open shove here.

Edit: I don't know how much I wanna say about this.. but metagame in these spots is really interesting. With 2x the pot, you have the ability to force him to commit his whole stack when you only have to pay half of it. Abusing this well is difficult and subtle, but very profitable.

One of the things that separates the people making like 8-10 PTBB from those making less is their ability to recognize how stack sizes ACTUALLY affect a situation--as opposed to the sort of SSNL wisdom which just says when deep drawing hands are good and marginal hands are bad.

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you explain this a little more, or point me in the direction of some information that could help me understand what you talking about here?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 07-25-2007, 11:00 AM
thedustbustr thedustbustr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,556
Default Re: KQs vs. LAG

against a tag i'd check/fold, ak gets paid off by worse aces all the time here.

against this guy you might as well shove for $200.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.