Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Have you ever accessed your poker/neteller/etc accounts on a computer other than your own?
Yes 12 32.43%
No 25 67.57%
Voters: 37. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 06-11-2007, 08:27 AM
jogger08152 jogger08152 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,510
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
Sure they have gotten more expensive,

[/ QUOTE ]
Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-11-2007, 09:36 PM
blackize blackize is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Maryland
Posts: 5,037
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

Jogger, you [censored] moron, one small aspect of entertainment has gotten more expensive while nearly everything else has decreased in price and increased in value.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-11-2007, 10:09 PM
pvn pvn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: back despite popular demand
Posts: 10,955
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
Jogger, you [censored] moron, one small aspect of entertainment has gotten more expensive while nearly everything else has decreased in price and increased in value.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hand-made custom furniture has probably gotten more expensive, too. But furniture in general is vastly cheaper. Lobster has gotten more expensive, food in general much cheaper.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:02 AM
jogger08152 jogger08152 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,510
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
Jogger, you [censored] moron, one small aspect of entertainment has gotten more expensive while nearly everything else has decreased in price and increased in value.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reread my verrrrrry first post in this thread. I'll post the relevant part of it for you, along with the comment it responded to:

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
entertainment prices have decreased,

[/ QUOTE ]

Go to movies and/or concerts much?

[/ QUOTE ]

Out of 15 or 20 replies to my post, you're the very first guy who granted me my specific point. Of course, you called me a [censored] moron in your reply, so you're about on par with your fellow ACers in terms of civility, but I do think you deserve props for being (even if just by a narrow margin) more intellectually honest than the average ACer.

Best regards,
Jogger
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-12-2007, 09:42 AM
Copernicus Copernicus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,912
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
Out of 15 or 20 replies to my post, you're the very first guy who granted me my specific point. Jogger

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you missed one:

:"As far as movies and concerts go, that is cherry picking two aspects of the industry that have increased, when entertainment as a whole is clearly down. The movie comparison is weak anyway, since there are many more venues to watch movies that are in fact cheaper than they were, and at far greater convenience. Concerts are also not the greatest comparison, first because it is very low supply, second, prices cannot be decreased by technology, and third the disposable income of concert goers has increased far more than average wages have increased. The $300 its costing me to see Roger Waters Friday means a lot less than the scalped $55 it cost to the Wall, and the disposable income of teen concert goers today vs teen concert goers in 1980 has grown even more than my income has. "
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 06-12-2007, 05:10 PM
jogger08152 jogger08152 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,510
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Out of 15 or 20 replies to my post, you're the very first guy who granted me my specific point. Jogger

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you missed one:

:"As far as movies and concerts go, that is cherry picking two aspects of the industry that have increased, when entertainment as a whole is clearly down. The movie comparison is weak anyway, since there are many more venues to watch movies that are in fact cheaper than they were, and at far greater convenience. Concerts are also not the greatest comparison, first because it is very low supply, second, prices cannot be decreased by technology, and third the disposable income of concert goers has increased far more than average wages have increased. The $300 its costing me to see Roger Waters Friday means a lot less than the scalped $55 it cost to the Wall, and the disposable income of teen concert goers today vs teen concert goers in 1980 has grown even more than my income has. "

[/ QUOTE ]
No, he's still incorrectly holding out on movies. (If all you ever did was rent, never going to the theatre, they'd cost the same as they did 50 years ago in proportion to one's income.)
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 06-13-2007, 01:57 PM
natedogg natedogg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California
Posts: 2,570
Default Re: For-profit universal healthcare: would it work in the US?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Why would you want to force someone to buy insurance?

I love that idea! Can I get a law passed that forces everyone to buy my services?

natedogg

[/ QUOTE ]

dont knock it, the insurance industry did it for auto.

[/ QUOTE ]

The carseat manufacturers are close behind. They keep getting the assembly to pass new laws making the age/size limits bigger and bigger. What a racket.

natedogg
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.