|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Night posts should be: | |||
| Deleted as soon as possible |
   
|
23 | 39.66% |
| Left up so everyone can read them |
  
|
26 | 44.83% |
| Don't Know/Results |
  
|
9 | 15.52% |
| Voters: 58. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#42
02-27-2007, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
[ QUOTE ]
Durrrr is just so sik in the head, I have seen him play but its truly sikness. [/ QUOTE ] Could anyone explain why durrrr's play is sikness? just curious [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] 
|
|
#44
02-27-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Durrrr is just so sik in the head, I have seen him play but its truly sikness. [/ QUOTE ] I can join the cool kid club also [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#45
02-27-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
[ QUOTE ]
Shoving or inducing shoves preflop is way overrated. More bb variance and more risk. How is this not logical. [/ QUOTE ] You didn't include profit? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#46
02-27-2007, 05:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
Fine. If your expected return is 20% a month at 1/2 and >= 10% at 2/4, variance is your friend because it will help you move up faster where you generate a higher total profit. But lets say the difference is between 5/10 and 10/20, you'll probably experience drastically diminishing returns, which reduces the value of moving up. If moving up is not at least comparably profitable, I'd rather get returns at a lower level with reduced variance (through pot control).
|
|
#47
02-27-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
Err, I don't get your logic. Most profitable option = the most $$$. Take the extra $$$ and don't move up if you don't want to.
|
|
#48
02-27-2007, 06:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
This was a response to profit question. Yes, if you get it in for $100 1000x with 70% EV your total profit is 70k.
If you play for $30 1000x with 82% EV your total profit is 24k. Thus it will take 2.8x as many hands to win an equivalent amount of money. However, you will risk 3.3x the money in each instance you shove preflop. Thus risk/reward ratios are not optimal when shoving.
|
|
#49
02-27-2007, 06:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
[ QUOTE ]
you should rewatch the vid and write down every single situation where you would do someting differently and then discuss it with others. [/ QUOTE ] This little gem of advice really spoke to me. I will do exactly this when watching CR/Stox/PXF etc. So obvious really. Gotta learn to make them big buxx.
|
|
#50
02-27-2007, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Durr signed with Cardrunners...
[ QUOTE ]
This was a response to profit question. Yes, if you get it in for $100 1000x with 70% EV your total profit is 70k. If you play for $30 1000x with 82% EV your total profit is 24k. Thus it will take 2.8x as many hands to win an equivalent amount of money. However, you will risk 3.3x the money in each instance you shove preflop. Thus risk/reward ratios are not optimal when shoving. [/ QUOTE ] SALAZARRRRRRRRR A++++++ EV analysis. Would read again
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
