![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder what hand he held ... [/ QUOTE ] A8 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I wonder what hand he held ... [/ QUOTE ] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Maybe his heart stopped when he realized one of the cards on the board was also in his hand. Whooooops!
S.B.T.C [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Sucks to be the button eh? [/ QUOTE ] Well, yeah. He had a heart attack. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
This is why I do think that ethical consideration is in order here and just like contracts parties involved must complete their end of the deal (waging at the tables could be considered a quasi contract - action begets action and concludes when all parties have acted).
When the potential action is interrupted due to death, then all bets should be off. I don't agree with the ruling and think they neglect to consider the more ethical question of what it takes to complete the deal. Perhaps a better rule would be to allow the dead guy's hand stand as though he were all in [no matter what action followed upon his death] and let the chips fall where they may. |
![]() |
|
|