![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's on. Look's like same lineup as last week. If the preview is correct, someone will replace Ramdin in this episode. DN has quads on the first hand.
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
DN has quads on the first hand. [/ QUOTE ] Did he get drawn out on by a straight flush? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
does it start at 7 pac time?
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Doyle complains about extending Jamie Gold credit. Interesting.
Or was he complaining about giving credit to Mike Matasow? Either way, interesting. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle complains about extending Jamie Gold credit. Interesting. Or was he complaining about giving credit to Mike Matasow? Either way, interesting. [/ QUOTE ] I was confused about what happened. Did Mike want to loan Jamie 50k then have the table extend him 50k in credit to play behind? That's what it sounded like and what Doyle got mad about but Doyle had no issue with everyone at the table each spotting Jamie an equal amount. I was confused so if anyone has some insight I'd love to know more. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dunno, but I thought it was hilarious when Mike asked if he could play behind and Doyle was like, "hell no! what are you, nuts?" I thought that was a reflection of Mike's credit rating. Or, if the comment was directed at Gold then it was a comment on Gold's credit rating. Either way, pretty cool.
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle complains about extending Jamie Gold credit. Interesting. Or was he complaining about giving credit to Mike Matasow? Either way, interesting. [/ QUOTE ] That's the way I read it- Doyle didn't want to risk taking down the Mouth and being stuck with a $50K marker from Mike. I thought his later counter-offer confirmed that, since it spread the risk while getting an extra $50K on the table. ? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle complains about extending Jamie Gold credit. Interesting. Or was he complaining about giving credit to Mike Matasow? Either way, interesting. [/ QUOTE ] I think he was more concerned about where the credit was coming from (read: Matusow) who, as Gabe mentioned, was probably staked himself. Matusow telling someone he will lend them 50 dimes really doesn't have any validity. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle complains about extending Jamie Gold credit. Interesting. Or was he complaining about giving credit to Mike Matasow? Either way, interesting. [/ QUOTE ] Gold shows up with only 100k, losses most of it and asks someone to loan him 50k. Matasow volunteers and doesn’t say if he’s playing behind or not till someone asks. Mike should have said he's was playing behind immediately, and why is Gold coming short stacked and asking to borrow money. If Mike losses all his money and Gold doesn't pay him, who's resposible? Doyle wanted to get all that straight. He just didn't like the way everything was going down. |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
![]() |
|
|