![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bet like $40ish on this flop, call the shove.
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
surely villain can easily have suited connectors this deep
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
surely villain can easily have suited connectors this deep [/ QUOTE ] Its possible but its not something I am really affraid for. Besides I can lay it down if one of those cards hit, basically I prefer giving a free card and not put in to much money against sets. If you get a lot of action his range will usually be overpairs and hands that have you crushed, I personally hate the concept of pot control but being this deep its warranted... |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't give arguments but my advice isn't poor [/ QUOTE ] Ehm ok, so if u check the flop for pot control which is what im assuming ur doing, what do u do when 7, 6, 3, 8 come? I mean a 4 or 5 isnt a great card either. I can see why but your deep against a donk, bet the flop for value. Checking here isn't going to win you more money from 10s-Ks because he already thinks its the nutz. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe villian wants you to think that? |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] surely villain can easily have suited connectors this deep [/ QUOTE ] Its possible but its not something I am really affraid for. Besides I can lay it down if one of those cards hit, basically I prefer giving a free card and not put in to much money against sets. If you get a lot of action his range will usually be overpairs and hands that have you crushed, I personally hate the concept of pot control but being this deep its warranted... [/ QUOTE ] I agree with you but my coach doesn't. I'm confused... |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] surely villain can easily have suited connectors this deep [/ QUOTE ] Its possible but its not something I am really affraid for. Besides I can lay it down if one of those cards hit, basically I prefer giving a free card and not put in to much money against sets. If you get a lot of action his range will usually be overpairs and hands that have you crushed, I personally hate the concept of pot control but being this deep its warranted... [/ QUOTE ] I agree with you but my coach doesn't. I'm confused... [/ QUOTE ] There is loads of value in betting this flop and we are very rarely beat here. |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] surely villain can easily have suited connectors this deep [/ QUOTE ] Its possible but its not something I am really affraid for. Besides I can lay it down if one of those cards hit, basically I prefer giving a free card and not put in to much money against sets. If you get a lot of action his range will usually be overpairs and hands that have you crushed, I personally hate the concept of pot control but being this deep its warranted... [/ QUOTE ] I agree with you but my coach doesn't. I'm confused... [/ QUOTE ] There is loads of value in betting this flop and we are very rarely beat here. [/ QUOTE ] Ok but if this is QQ do we check? Also is KK played the same in this pot? I've thought about this hand for awhile and I think betting the flop is better like you said, but am unsure of how to play more marginal spots like KK-QQ. Do we still bet/call push with 200bbs? |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
how to play more marginal spots like KK-QQ. Do we still bet/call push with 200bbs? [/ QUOTE ] I am not putting in 200 BBs with KK/QQ because now I'd have to worry that villain has AA/KK in addition to the possible sets. |
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
give yourself queens and we have a discussion...well, probably not
|
![]() |
|
|