DOYLE on loaning/and being part of the in group

[ICallHimGamblor]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BAN plz, K thx

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Done.

Merry Xmas.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you very much.

[donkeylove]

Thank god. That post made no sense. That article actually cast a positive light on poker. Loaning a guy a million on honor alone. Nowhere outside poker does your word mean anything anymore. Great ban.

[jetfish]

Thanks Dids!

[sternroolz]

Tks!

[MiltonFriedman]

Finally, the game broke up and he turned and said to me, "Hey, I loaned that guy a million bucks -- and I don't even know his last name!"

His name was Gold, Jamie Gold.

(Kathy's posts are about as insightful as Paul Harvey's on 'ludes.)

[Howard Treesong]

[ QUOTE ]
you write like Russ G., you cover the same topics as Russ G., and, in this thread, you have posted a quote in an attempt to prove something, and have not only failed to do so, but your attempt was so poor that no one even knows what you were trying to prove.

[/ QUOTE ]

As much as I hate to give Kathy a compliment, I must say that her writing is ever slightly more effective than Russ G's.

[Stellastarr]

Free Kathy!

Liebert?

[Assani Fisher]

Why are people calling for a ban? It wasn't the most interesting thread of all time, but it certainly isn't ban-worthy imo.

[Dementia]

[ QUOTE ]
Why are people calling for a ban? It wasn't the most interesting thread of all time, but it certainly isn't ban-worthy imo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cause others are doing it.

[mlagoo]

because shes posted the same thing in like 3 other threads, as well as posting the same responses in several different thread,s as well as generally posting ridiculous threads and being an alarmist and being generally terrible

im pretty sure its ok to ban someone for being objectively terrible