Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-03-2006, 08:16 PM
ericicecream ericicecream is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Gypsy
Posts: 754
Default Re: What is your definition of Regulation?

[ QUOTE ]
I personally do NOT want regulation. The major sites are plenty safe. Regulation is just a fancy word for big brother to say 'gimme gimme gimme.'

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but I don't think we will stay status quo. If their is not a successful challenge by the WTO or other means, then I doubt we have seen the last anti-internet-gaming legislation.

Regulation may not be better than what we have today, but may be better than what is to come (assuming no successful challenge).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-03-2006, 08:17 PM
DrewOnTilt DrewOnTilt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: You talkin\' to me?
Posts: 3,054
Default Re: What is your definition of Regulation?

[ QUOTE ]
Would you advise foreign operation of poker rooms to continue, be banned, or work side by side with companies based on US soil?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure about U.S. trade law, but many countries require that foreign companies operating in certain business segments take on a minority ownership role only. For example, my employer's operation in India is a joint venture, and we own a noncontrolling stake of 49%. The joint venture partner is the primary party that is held accountable for proper market conduct.

I envision a scenario where a company such as Harrah's would partner with Stars or Party, with Stars or Party owning 49%. Harrah's would then be held accountable for tax reporting, audits, and other regulatory requirements.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-04-2006, 01:47 AM
*TT* *TT* is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vehicle Chooser For Life!
Posts: 17,198
Default Re: What is your definition of Regulation?

[ QUOTE ]
I envision a scenario where a company such as Harrah's would partner with Stars or Party, with Stars or Party owning 49%. Harrah's would then be held accountable for tax reporting, audits, and other regulatory requirements.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is protectionisim. See the WTO case of Antigua vs USA for more info.

TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-03-2006, 09:21 PM
permafrost permafrost is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 618
Default Re: What is your definition of Regulation?

Article about the new law and how it will lead to regulation

This is a great read if you have not seen it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-05-2006, 04:37 AM
SNOWBALL SNOWBALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the citizens kneel 4 sex
Posts: 7,795
Default Re: What is your definition of Regulation?

I think regulations could potentially be very very bad. They might make the highest limit available 5/10 LHE or 100NL. They might tax it so badly that the rake goes up really high. They might place waiting periods on sign-ups. The more I think about it the more sick I get.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.