Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:11 AM
Suigin406 Suigin406 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: fire isiah and minaya
Posts: 8,613
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

thx for the nice post nate...
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:15 AM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 8,132
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

[ QUOTE ]
I have written to Peter Mandelson, the European Commissioner for External Trade, to ask for clarification on their position on this.

Given previous debates over bananas, scottish woollen textiles, I also think this has the potential to be a sizeable issue.

The angle I emphasised was the carve out of US based interests (in particular online horse betting) from the legislation, which reflects protectionism rather than a moral imperative (which sadly is your own business).

Not sure whether it is worth other Europeans doing this? I am angry about this legislation, so dread to think the impact on you guys. Condolences, I'm afraid the US has just lost one of its few European supporters. I just don't know what your country stands for anymore.

[/ QUOTE ]

It's clearly protectionism for reasons you cite.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:17 AM
XxPenguinxX XxPenguinxX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: creating an HUSNG website
Posts: 335
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

As a boring point - can companies (as opposed to natural persons) be extradited?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-02-2006, 10:57 AM
[censored] [censored] is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: mortally hurting
Posts: 9,174
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

Nate,

ya it looks like you nailed it. Im really not that worried honestly. People came to Party, stars etc not because they created anything new but because people had a desire to play poker and they were positioned best. People are still going to want to play poker on the internet, including winning and losing players.

other sites will fill the void and outside of the short term I expect things to continue as is. this could actually be a positive thing mid/long term from the competition created from the party/stars void.

the bigger concern is not being able to play on a specific site is the funding accounts issue which is still up in the air
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-02-2006, 12:53 PM
Nate tha\\\' Great Nate tha\\\' Great is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: blogging
Posts: 8,480
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

[ QUOTE ]
party, pacific (888) - gibraltar (UK)
stars - isle of man (UK)
ongame - sweden
full tilt - USA (guess they are the most screwed here?)

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong, Full Tilt is another one of the Kahnawake Gaming Commission sites (Canada).

[ QUOTE ]
paradise - UK (how come they dont cave same as party/888 then?)

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with the "read" made by others that these companies with US-facing sportsbooks have already digested the legality issues and are less likely to pull out immediately.

[ QUOTE ]
crypto - canada

[/ QUOTE ]

Moving to Ireland.

[ QUOTE ]
bodog - costa rica
ultimate - canada
absolute - canada(?)

[/ QUOTE ]

Ultimate and Absolute are also Kahnawake sites.
[ QUOTE ]
b2b - sweden
wpx - antigua

[/ QUOTE ]

Summary: it looks like the four Kahnawake sites (Full Tilt, UB, Absolute, Pokerroom) will likely stay in business (to US customers), as will Bodog (Costa Rica) and WPX (Antigua). The publicly traded sites based in UK/Irleand have all pulled out.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:02 PM
geormiet geormiet is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,237
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

absolute is based in costa rica, but I think they have some offices in canada.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:07 PM
jmillerdls jmillerdls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,704
Default Nate\'s list of probable sites to stay open to US customers!!

"Summary: it looks like the four Kahnawake sites (Full Tilt, UB, Absolute, Pokerroom) will likely stay in business (to US customers), as will Bodog (Costa Rica) and WPX (Antigua). The publicly traded sites based in UK/Irleand have all pulled out."
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:11 PM
Richas Richas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: On the learning curve
Posts: 484
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

[ QUOTE ]

The UK will extradite faster than you can type PWNED.

This was a very high profile case and I assure you that the people in Gibraltar are VERY familiar with this.

Sorry for the negative.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/13072006/34...n-journey.html

[/ QUOTE ]

Not for this we won't. The Natwest Three (I prefer Enron Three) case did cause a row but what they are alleged to have done would also be a crime in the UK. The UK extradition treaty does fast track extradition whilst the US Senate could not be arsed to ratify your end of the treaty, not enough time in the past 4 years apparently, but no UK judge will extradite someone for something that is not a crime in the UK.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:47 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: moneyhater
Posts: 17,046
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

nate,

you are not dumb.

that said, i still blame you.

bob
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-02-2006, 01:55 PM
KDawg KDawg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the nectar of the gods
Posts: 5,305
Default Re: The heart of the matter: extradition

[ QUOTE ]

Summary: it looks like the four Kahnawake sites (Full Tilt, UB, Absolute, Pokerroom) will likely stay in business (to US customers), as will Bodog (Costa Rica) and WPX (Antigua). The publicly traded sites based in UK/Irleand have all pulled out.

[/ QUOTE ]


nate, wouldn't FT have to do a trade off of ownership if they want to stay in buisness, as those who mainly run the company are all americans(Lederer, Gordon, etc)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.