|
|
#41
09-09-2006, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official #1 The Ohio State University @ #2 Texas Thread***
Terrible call on the roughing the passer
|
|
#47
09-09-2006, 09:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official #1 The Ohio State University @ #2 Texas Thread***
The call is not bogus. As one commentator said, in the technicality of the rule the call was correct. I myself, even as a Texas fan, must say that it was weak, but I'll take it.
As for the game, both offenses look pretty good. Texas has the running game going and just found their passing game. OSU's passing game is clearly better, and Ginn is plain scary. Although, I believe that if the game continues like this, Texas will win because they can adjust at half time to prevent OSU's passing game from being so effective, and make them run the ball, which they have yet to prove to be able to do. OH BY THE WAY: UT'S DEFENSIVE BACKS ARE ABSOLUTELY PATHETIC, AND THAT INCLUDES AARRON ROSS. THE ONLY ONE THAT STILL HAS MY RESPECT AS A FAN IS MICHAEL GRIFFIN(#27). FOSTER(#28) IS AN ABSOLUTE DISGRACE. HE LET GONZALES RUN HIM IN CIRCLES. HOOKEM
|
|
#48
09-09-2006, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official #1 The Ohio State University @ #2 Texas Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
I actually think Texas will do OK against Ginn [/ QUOTE ] I lied.
|
|
#49
09-09-2006, 09:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official #1 The Ohio State University @ #2 Texas Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
The announcers are being diplomatic... "questionable call" replace "questionable" with "completely and totally bogus" [/ QUOTE ] Agreed, that was the worst call I've ever seen.
|
|
#50
09-09-2006, 09:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***Official #1 The Ohio State University @ #2 Texas Thread***
I'm pretty sure there has been worse. And this call was correct, if you watch closely, their helmets do collide- maybe not intentionally, but they DO. It's a rather weak call, and I would be upset if I was rooting for OSU, but it is what it is, now shut up about it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
