![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm a 2+2er and no one knows me...muahaha. I would never ever end up on a leaderboard though, so it's not like my anonymity is at risk.
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
just do it
|
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
I don't think anyone cares about anonymity if you play enough sngs to win the TLB people will know who you are. Personally I think their should be 3 leader boards low stakes 5-27, medium stakes 60-114, and High Stakes 215+ and the winner's should simply be whoever makes the most money
|
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds good to me...one question tho-define SNG please, just 1 table or 1,2,3,5,20. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
|
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Sounds good to me...one question tho-define SNG please, just 1 table or 1,2,3,5,20. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] The 20/180s and 50/90s count towards the MTT leaderboard, so i'm guessing that everything else would count towards a SNG leaderboard. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sounds great. I'l be up there when I actually have working internet [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Proly the best idea would be to count just straight up VIP points accumulated from SNGs? Just a thought [/ QUOTE ] This is a bad idea. it completely takes skill out of the equation. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
I like the idea of a leaderboard, and I think 2 or 3 leaderboards based on buyin is a great idea.
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think that a leaderboard was be awsome. While I do not like everything about full tilt's leaderboard (ie more then 1st 2nd and 3rd places getting points for the leaderboard) I love the fact that they have 2 leaderboards; 1 for highstakes and 1 for low stakes.
I think this is something that Stars should mos def do as it would give everyone a legetimate (sp) shot at making it onto the leaderboard. Which in turn would increase play. |
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
I could care less if people saw me on the leaderboard.
I would like it though if, as someone else said, it's not strictly volume related. Maybe a points-per-game ratio with a minimum number of games? Or maybe prizes split between a volume leader and a points-per-game leader? Maybe even by level of game? That'd end up putting out a bunch of smaller prizes over multiple leader boards, but it'd be nice to have bragging rights at my level of play even if it didn't have a big bonus attached. The leaderboards for me don't mean anything anywhere right now as a goal because I have to A) play high entry fee levels, and B) play a lot of them. I play a medium amount of medium entry fee games, but I play them pretty well. |
![]() |
|
|