Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:29 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Recliner of Rage
Posts: 4,383
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
One thing I don't like is the real cash on the table. That's obviously just done to please the TV producers and make it look 'exciting'.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is extremely common practice in no-cap NL games
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:31 PM
kflop kflop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

Yes there are too many commercials and yes somebody in the production seems to want to overemphasize how much money is in each pot.

But, we have been giving the opportunity to see the best players in the world, playing real poker. I’ve been hearing about these games for twenty years and am fascinated by everything. The table conversation is great and I love the subtle and not so subtle moves they make. Kaplan's analysis is right on and his jokes are funny to me.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-24-2006, 09:35 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
Jennifer Harlan

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the fifth different way I've seen this last name spelled.

In any case, having paper cash out on the table isn't too uncommon for higher-limit games. I'm sure that GSN probably encouraged players to do it, but they likely would have done it otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-24-2006, 10:08 PM
NYplayer NYplayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 512
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
Kaplan's analysis is right on

[/ QUOTE ]

in the hand where jen flopped As and 4s. the pot was 19K on the turn. and ted had a flush draw. Gabe said she should bet 22K so that he is wrong to call. she bets 11 or 12K (i can't remember how much) and gabe says "now ted is correct to call for the flush". isn't that just wrong? paying 11K for a 30K pot is not correct for a flush draw.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-24-2006, 10:11 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Kaplan's analysis is right on

[/ QUOTE ]

in the hand where jen flopped As and 4s. the pot was 19K on the turn. and ted had a flush draw. Gabe said she should bet 22K so that he is wrong to call. she bets 11 or 12K (i can't remember how much) and gabe says "now ted is correct to call for the flush". isn't that just wrong? paying 11K for a 30K pot is not correct for a flush draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's considering implied odds.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-24-2006, 10:18 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Recliner of Rage
Posts: 4,383
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Kaplan's analysis is right on

[/ QUOTE ]

in the hand where jen flopped As and 4s. the pot was 19K on the turn. and ted had a flush draw. Gabe said she should bet 22K so that he is wrong to call. she bets 11 or 12K (i can't remember how much) and gabe says "now ted is correct to call for the flush". isn't that just wrong? paying 11K for a 30K pot is not correct for a flush draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's considering implied odds.

[/ QUOTE ]

Plus he had 2 K outs
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-24-2006, 10:32 PM
kflop kflop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 171
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Kaplan's analysis is right on

[/ QUOTE ]

in the hand where jen flopped As and 4s. the pot was 19K on the turn. and ted had a flush draw. Gabe said she should bet 22K so that he is wrong to call. she bets 11 or 12K (i can't remember how much) and gabe says "now ted is correct to call for the flush". isn't that just wrong? paying 11K for a 30K pot is not correct for a flush draw.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you suggesting that Jennifer is getting away from aces and fours if a heart comes on the river? I think she might bet out(15-20k). The question is, can she get away from it when TF raises? My opinion, probably.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-24-2006, 11:37 PM
ChuckyB ChuckyB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fox Soccer Report
Posts: 2,470
Default I WAY prefer Live at the Bike

If they put out a High Stakes Poker DVD condensing the 13 episodes into the (probably) 3 hours of poker action, with no black where the commericials would be, I'd be down.

Four breaks in the first half hour and I lost track of and subtle genius in their play.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-25-2006, 03:09 AM
elric elric is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 111
Default Re: I WAY prefer Live at the Bike

Awesome stuff! DN gets stuck for 3/4 million... I can't wait to see the heavy action. Might give some insight on how to attack the deep money with a shortbuy in NL cash games with no maximum buyin.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-25-2006, 03:41 AM
gilbert gilbert is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,940
Default Re: High Stakes Poker -- January 23

i [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] high stakes poker so much.

it's the only poker i watch on tv anymore.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.