![]() |
|
#41
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
|
nath,
yawn |
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
|
all,
stu ungar's call with T high on the river HU wins, and I cannot see how any other hand is close. |
|
#44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
:grin: |
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
|
Actually, Stuey's call with the ten high is pretty good because it not only incorporates the fact that he figured out something in the line made no sense and picked off the bluff, but that he was able to narrow down Mansour's range such that he determined ten high was good.
After all, it's hard to pick off a bluff with ten high if your opponent has queen high. |
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
yeah this is clearly the winner seidel's a high call is up there as well. nath's call is totally standard- i think he's a donk for even tanking- i super mega insta call w/ bottom pair there :grin: |
|
#47
|
|||
|
|||
|
Match Round I, Level I (10/20) - 2006/05/28 - 05:35:17 (ET)
Table '25502980 1' 2-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: x (1550 in chips) Seat 2: y (1450 in chips) x: posts small blind 10 y: posts big blind 20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to y [6h 5h] x: raises 100 to 120 y: calls 100 *** FLOP *** [4d 8h 9h] y: checks x: bets 180 y: raises 1150 to 1330 and is all-in x: calls 1150 *** TURN *** [4d 8h 9h] [Th] *** RIVER *** [4d 8h 9h Th] [Qs] *** SHOW DOWN *** y: shows [6h 5h] (a flush, Ten high) x: shows [2s Qh] (a pair of Queens) y collected 2900 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 2900 | Rake 0 Board [4d 8h 9h Th Qs] Seat 1: x (button) (small blind) showed [2s Qh] and lost with a pair of Queens Seat 2: y (big blind) showed [6h 5h] and won (2900) with a flush, Ten high misclick? nope. |
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#49
|
|||
|
|||
|
props props props props props props
|
|
#50
|
|||
|
|||
|
(heehaw)
|
![]() |
|
|