Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Would you rather be broke as a joke or a filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian?
Broke as a Joke 13 24.53%
Filthy rich overweight AxisOfEvilian 40 75.47%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4651  
Old 06-28-2007, 01:48 PM
PJo336 PJo336 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: N.O.Y.B. imo
Posts: 3,924
Default Re: Empire is not nice

[ QUOTE ]
HOLY [censored]..






HOLY [censored]

After playing on hollywood, i thought u couldnt make a worse layout, well pacific poker did it. Not only it lags like [censored] u cant remove the allin button, u cant see stack sizes, cos when someone folds, it says folds for 3 ages. And u dont have instant hand history reviewer. SO u cant see what they had last hand .

HORRIBLE FKING SOFTWARE.

I just flopped top set vs super calling station. So on the river pot is huge, were both 250BB deep. 150BB pot. i bet the amount i have behind me, but somehow the fking software didnt get my last number and i bet TWO [censored] DOLLARS.

[/ QUOTE ]

i guess the software matches the players? I wish i had pacific back, those 10k tourneys they ran 3-4 times a day were the tops, i final tabled 3 of those i believe, and won one
  #4652  
Old 06-28-2007, 01:53 PM
Shoe Lace Shoe Lace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 585
Default Re: Empire is not nice

[ QUOTE ]
I know I can't be the only one who checks their bankroll non-stop when playing, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought I was the only one. If I'm not checking out instant hand histories, reloading, or writing notes then I'm checking my roll lol.
  #4653  
Old 06-28-2007, 01:56 PM
Jago Jago is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 891
Default Re: Empire is not nice

Oh, where would you recommend someone who's played (and is a winner at) $1/$2 limit and 10-12% ROI at Star's 16s to start at NL cash, assuming I have 20+ BIs for the 200NL games?
  #4654  
Old 06-28-2007, 01:58 PM
PJo336 PJo336 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: N.O.Y.B. imo
Posts: 3,924
Default Re: Empire is not nice

I would say 50nl, maybe 100nl if ur feeling bold, but id do 50nl till u got used to the feel of nl
  #4655  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:04 PM
Jago Jago is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 891
Default Re: Empire is not nice

is there a big skill difference between 100nl, 50nl and say 25nl? atm I have 700 at the cryptos, 600 at stars and a bunch at bodog, but since bodog doesnt have PT/PAHUD im down to either crypto or stars. I have rakeback at crypto and silverstar at stars. Assuming my objective is to get better while i rake in the dough as a NL player which site should I play on?
  #4656  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:13 PM
Shizzle12345 Shizzle12345 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mordegai, the jiddish clown
Posts: 3,557
Default Re: Empire is not nice

WRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAh jesus christ. Is it normal that this fking FKING software lags the FKING [censored] out of me. I click raise 3 times when i have AA and somehow it didn tget it and my aces are getting foled AGAIN. Im gonna remove this [censored] retarded software from my pc and never play again there
  #4657  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:15 PM
Jago Jago is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 891
Default Re: Empire is not nice

Are you referring to pacific poker? How many tables are you playing? When I played 1/2 there I found the lag was insane if I tried to play more than 3 tables, even 3 tables was lagging if I had irc/msn/firefox on. Most of the time I just 2 table.
  #4658  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:28 PM
Shoe Lace Shoe Lace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 585
Default Re: Empire is not nice

I'd guess he's talking about FTP. A lot of people have been complaining about the latest FTP being extremely resource intensive for no apparent reason on some machines.
  #4659  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:29 PM
Shizzle12345 Shizzle12345 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mordegai, the jiddish clown
Posts: 3,557
Default Re: Empire is not nice

[ QUOTE ]
Are you referring to pacific poker? How many tables are you playing? When I played 1/2 there I found the lag was insane if I tried to play more than 3 tables, even 3 tables was lagging if I had irc/msn/firefox on. Most of the time I just 2 table.

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah that site is horrible, i have a pretty good computer, but it lags the [censored] out of me. I just can tplay there normal, I just folded the nut flush lol, urnning hot as [censored] but this crappy [censored] site keeps folding hands for me.
  #4660  
Old 06-28-2007, 02:29 PM
netstorm netstorm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 902
Default Re: Empire is not nice

[ QUOTE ]
Oh, where would you recommend someone who's played (and is a winner at) $1/$2 limit and 10-12% ROI at Star's 16s to start at NL cash, assuming I have 20+ BIs for the 200NL games?

[/ QUOTE ]

5k hands at $25nl
around 20-30k hands at $50nl, and see if you can beat it for a good ptbb/100

after that, just follow the standard moving up lines for $100nl and above. NL cash is so much more postflop, although your ICM push/call/fold ranges PF will help you immensely against shortstacks.

Im sure Gelford will popup in and give some advice aswell, since he's also a former SNG -> cash game player
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.