OT: [censored] thread, Feb, READ RULES IN TOP POST

[bigt439]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
People are much more likely to call your river bet with 2nd/3rd pair (after you check the turn) than they are to call your turn bet with the same hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah, i use the line you love when i want to value bet my weak top pair, good 2nd pair, whatever, depending on opponent. but maybe this is just something fundamentally different at .25/.5, .5/1 and anything higher?

[/ QUOTE ]

higher you get the more they call...

easy game

[Josem]

http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com/

self explanatory.

[bigt439]

[ QUOTE ]
Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite.

On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often.

[/ QUOTE ]

sooo true... people think stats are a substitue for good reads... you should see the notes i have on people... i still try and go through every hh that goes to showdown and i 6 table...

no replacement for good solid reads...

[microbet]

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com/

self explanatory.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks, but doesn't cover the county I need. Also, the online places seem to mostly only go back 7 years. I think I need a cop or someone who knows a cop.

[Eagles]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another thing in cash is to really watch your opponents. I had a couple of players in one game the other night who had fairly similar loose passive stats and played somewhat similarly preflop, but postflop they were almost exactly the opposite.

On HUD, even looking at a lot of stats they looked the same, but one guy was betting whenever he had a hand and never bluffing or semi-bluffing and the other guy slowplayed everything, but bluffed fairly often.

[/ QUOTE ]

sooo true... people think stats are a substitue for good reads... you should see the notes i have on people... i still try and go through every hh that goes to showdown and i 6 table...

no replacement for good solid reads...

[/ QUOTE ]
Ya your right but I'm too lazy it's def a leak.

[xPeru]

OK Suzzer, sad b*stard that I am I wrote a spreadsheet to run a monte carlo simulation of SNG results at a given skill level. It's value is in showing what winning/losing streaks are "normal" if you don't change how you play. That is, it isolates variance so you know what to expect. It's not perfect, but if you want it, PM me and I'll email you or aim me, I'm xPeru on AIM.

[bigt439]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com/

self explanatory.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks, but doesn't cover the county I need. Also, the online places seem to mostly only go back 7 years. I think I need a cop or someone who knows a cop.

[/ QUOTE ]

hey microbet,

wtf?

[xPeru]

BTW if you've noticed my new avatar, technically it's a crusader knight getting the word of God. My interpretation is that it's me saying "wtf again" to the poker gods.

[Pudge714]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.easybackgroundchecks.com/

self explanatory.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks, but doesn't cover the county I need. Also, the online places seem to mostly only go back 7 years. I think I need a cop or someone who knows a cop.

[/ QUOTE ]

hey microbet,

wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ya I was about to post this. Random background checks?

[Josem]

[ QUOTE ]
Thanks, but doesn't cover the county I need. Also, the online places seem to mostly only go back 7 years. I think I need a cop or someone who knows a cop.

[/ QUOTE ]

In Australia there are criminal penalties (up to and including gaol, i think) for improperly accessing this sort of data.

Be careful that it is not illegal wherever you are.