![]() |
|
#411
|
|||
|
|||
|
GD it, time to write up a new hypothesis..
|
|
#412
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Going to chime in here to say that I believe at some point in the thread it was stated that if two NON 25/50 identical sources were found that rolen would accept g2cus 25/50 numbers. I believe this was proposed by twp. I am not going to reread the theard (holla) to figure out if that was precisely what was stated- but iirc that is how the "2 identical stats" thing was modified and or agreed to. Rolen accepted g2cus 25/50 numbers (on twps suggestion) provided someone could confirm/duplicate highstakes higher table numbers. Isnt that what has happened? Well played both and good luck to both with the panel. [/ QUOTE ] Yes this is my stance. And if TWP doesn't accept G2CU's 25/50 numbers then he's calling the validity of G2CU's PT shot into question, which is suicidal to his case. [/ QUOTE ] I think g2cu's numbers are correct. For all levels. I think that it is quite possible the data miners are not covering all of the correct sessions due to how PT tracks days or something like that. I think it would be very helpful if both data miners posted beginning and ending dates and times for each session. I know that if you have sessions which start and end on different days, PT can do weird things to them... [/ QUOTE ] I usually talk to this person everyday, so i will definitely know by monday whether or not i have anything else to add. Also, not to be a nit but has the issue of time zones been addressed, mine is PST fwiw. |
|
#413
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol. so is El D, I think. whatever. just talk to you dude at some point over the weekend and let us know if he has anything. if he does, cool, we'll wait for it. if he doesn't, cool, the panel will decide based on what they have.
|
|
#414
|
|||
|
|||
|
Wow, this thread blew up today. I'm almost sorry I missed it.
|
|
#415
|
|||
|
|||
|
nath,
Still waiting on a third panel member. PM me your AIM if you're interested. |
|
#416
|
|||
|
|||
|
el d,
nath refused to prove he won what he claimed he won within this thread. i do not believe he is a qualified third panel member. |
|
#417
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thread =
|
|
#418
|
|||
|
|||
|
i dont think its a trainwreck at all.
both sides are remaining civilized, open to the information at hand and willing to compromise on certain aspects of the bet. ive always thought twp was a good guy, but rolen really impressed me throughout the thread. a good debate or prop bet is a rarity on this site. |
|
#419
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Thread = [/ QUOTE ] aptly put, but I somewhat disagree - it looks as though they've successfully avoided what could have easily degenerated into an ISSF (Internet Sissy Slap Fight) and that at some point - Monday, as I understand, will actually be subjected to some sort of outcome. Now that outcome might be to declare the bet a "draw", which would be understandable if evidence is inconclusive, however it remains to be seen if any actual money changes hands provided the ruling is in favor of one party or the other. I remain convinced that IF a ruling is made in favor of one party over the other, that this topic still has at least a 57% chance of turning into an ISSF, devolving to a bitter and heated argument disputing the ruling, calling someone a welcher, etc. Of course this remains to be seen, and IMO is far less likely now that they've dropped the wager down to $100. Were it still at $1000, I almost guarentee no one would ever get paid. No offense to either party of course...you both seem pretty cool actually. I hope someone gets paid, because 40+ pages is ridiculous. |
|
#420
|
|||
|
|||
|
It's still a 1K bet mister.
I'm out for a while, no one say anything interesting for the next 8 hours ty. |
![]() |
|
|