FGators: The Final Chapter [1.4m hands EV graph]

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i remember reading somewhere where he wrote the pic is not him, but his cousin or something

[/ QUOTE ]

It's not my cousin its either me or its not.

[/ QUOTE ]
So, you don't know, either?

[/ QUOTE ]

[nath]

Doesn't it bother anyone else that FGators started signing his posts "Tucker" when someone found out where he got that picture (that he alternately claims is "either him or not him"), and then stopped when someone pointed out his name was Michael?

Like, that's what crazy people do. Straitjacket and padded room crazy.

(It's also what trolls do, but we have 1.4 million hands that indicate he is not a troll)

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
Doesn't it bother anyone else that FGators started signing his posts "Tucker" when someone found out where he got that picture (that he alternately claims is "either him or not him"), and then stopped when someone pointed out his name was Michael?

Like, that's what crazy people do. Straitjacket and padded room crazy.

(It's also what trolls do, but we have 1.4 million hands that indicate he is not a troll)

[/ QUOTE ]

why would it bother me that FGators is crazy? He's without a doubt mentally disturbed in some way - he's been presented with all the evidence that he is a breakeven player and simply denies it.

[hra146]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm pretty sure hra spent a lot of time going through my hands and still hasn't found more than a handful I played completely awful.

[/ QUOTE ]

tbh I didnt look at a single hh of yours. I only copy & pasted the 20 biggest pots and produced two graphs.

Sorry.

[FGators]

how am I a mentally disturbed person if I find this picture absolutely hysterical and was joking around about my name being Tucker?

nath is entirely too serious about all of this.

[FGators]

I kind of find it way more disturbing that people are going to that website, finding out the kids name and then comparing it to what my supposed name is, which may be Fred, Frank, Michael, or Tucker.

I could have put in Michael as a joke and it may be Tucker.

I may be Tucker.

Who knows?

[jaminbird]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't get how this works...I honestly am sucked out on a 250:1 ratio..in fact I can't remember the last time I coolered someone or got it in drawing to two outs and won yet it happens to me a large portion of the time so I don't know how this graph works. I've got a Word document with about $400k worth of total bad beats and I've probably only sucked out on people in about 5k worth of pots lifetime so thats how I do my pokerv graphs.

[/ QUOTE ]


This has probably been mentioned before, but the thread is major tl;dr

You never cooler anyone because you are such a huge nit that you never get it in without the best hand. Therefore, you never have an opportunity to suck out.

At first you might be thinking that never getting it in without the best hand is a good thing, but looking at the half a million dollars you lost in non-showdown hands, it doesn't appear to be a winning formula.

[nath]

[ QUOTE ]
how am I a mentally disturbed person if I find this picture absolutely hysterical and was joking around about my name being Tucker?

[/ QUOTE ]
It's not that; it's that your stubbornness and utter refusal to change your mind or thinking about your play, and your utter refusal to answer questions that you are incapable of answering because they address the flaws in your game, are indicative of someone in a severe case of denial and cognitive dissonance, which is probably indicative of some other mental imbalance, which your other posts support

[ QUOTE ]
nath is entirely too serious about all of this.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm too serious? Hey, I'm not the one playing losing poker for 1.4 million hands!

[goofyballer]

[ QUOTE ]
I could have put in Michael as a joke and it may be Tucker.

I may be Tucker.

Who knows?

[/ QUOTE ]

FGators has presented sufficient evidence on this forum to find him on Facebook. gogogo?

[FGators]

What evidence do you have to find me on facebook?

This should be good.

if I'm on facebook.