![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
I dunno, there's plenty of tournaments from 22-55 fo's and 3r-11r's daily. I think it should be enough.
The 22r is just one daily tournament, which just cost me on average a lot more than I want to spend now. I guess the 100 fo's are okay. |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
As I mentioned above, I am going out of town for a few days at the beginning of the month, but I'll be in for whatever up to $100 bet unless something drastic changes in the format. I'll ship before my first day of playing if that's cool...
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
I might be interested if it is limited to say top 10 scores. If it's top 20 or whatever I wouldn't be able to put in the volume to have a chance.
|
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
interested
|
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
what about the 3-tiered tlb challenge like may 2006 style? now that i am le baller i can do dat [/ QUOTE ] I think a 3 tier (High stakes(50+,22r+), Mid stakes (11-50,5r-22r) and Small Stakes (1-11, 3r)) challenge would be a lot of fun and would allow a greater participation from all members of 2+2. |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I think a 3 tier (High stakes(50+,22r+), Mid stakes (11-50,5r-22r) and Small Stakes (1-11, 3r)) challenge would be a lot of fun and would allow a greater participation from all members of 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] This is a good idea, but generates a lot more work for keeping the scores. Traditionally these challenges run on stars only, but this time we're planning to include ftp too. Does anyone have ideas for formulas and how we should keep track on everyones scores? |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think a 3 tier (High stakes(50+,22r+), Mid stakes (11-50,5r-22r) and Small Stakes (1-11, 3r)) challenge would be a lot of fun and would allow a greater participation from all members of 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] This is a good idea, but generates a lot more work for keeping the scores. Traditionally these challenges run on stars only, but this time we're planning to include ftp too. Does anyone have ideas for formulas and how we should keep track on everyones scores? [/ QUOTE ] People keep track of their own scores and you just verify whoever gets any sort of prize? |
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
The one last year they just sent in the TLB e-mail from Stars which seemed to work well.
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think a 3 tier (High stakes(50+,22r+), Mid stakes (11-50,5r-22r) and Small Stakes (1-11, 3r)) challenge would be a lot of fun and would allow a greater participation from all members of 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] This is a good idea, but generates a lot more work for keeping the scores. Traditionally these challenges run on stars only, but this time we're planning to include ftp too. Does anyone have ideas for formulas and how we should keep track on everyones scores? [/ QUOTE ] There is a points calculator on pocketfives that might work. Here is the link: http://www.pocketfives.com/7CD03796-...5B4870196.aspx |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
Im interested, so whats the final verdict on tournaments?
|
![]() |
|
|