|
|
#31
09-13-2007, 01:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't he 4-bet the turn with a set of 9s? Or, differently put, is it more likely he just called the 3-bet with a flush draw on the flop or just called the 3-bet with aset on the turn? And, either way, do you think Bob is so clearly beat here that he should fold? [/ QUOTE ] Little real value in raising. Probably doesn't get called with lesser hand. No chance that he should fold, given the read. I hope Bob wins. More monies to be available at Canterbury. 
|
|
#32
09-13-2007, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wouldn't he 4-bet the turn with a set of 9s? Or, differently put, is it more likely he just called the 3-bet with a flush draw on the flop or just called the 3-bet with aset on the turn? And, either way, do you think Bob is so clearly beat here that he should fold? [/ QUOTE ] I think Bob is ahead. The question is if he shoudl raise. I lean towards no, but not sure. [/ QUOTE ] It does look an awful lot like AQ. Raising is almost certainly right. That said, at the table I would have just called because I would probably have not thought it through as well as I can away from the heat of battle.
|
|
#33
09-13-2007, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Wouldn't he 4-bet the turn with a set of 9s? Or, differently put, is it more likely he just called the 3-bet with a flush draw on the flop or just called the 3-bet with aset on the turn? And, either way, do you think Bob is so clearly beat here that he should fold? [/ QUOTE ] I think Bob is ahead. The question is if he shoudl raise. I lean towards no, but not sure. [/ QUOTE ] It does look an awful lot like AQ. Raising is almost certainly right. [/ QUOTE ] there are only 4 hands he can have here, and AQ is not one of them.
|
|
#34
09-13-2007, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
I think people who are giving CO AQ or A6 have lost their minds. Either that, or he's definitely no expert. I think he has 99 or a flush. Either way, you're beat. I still think you should make a crying call however. The negatives far outweigh the benefits of folding this big of a pot for 1 bet.
|
|
#36
09-13-2007, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
I dont get it? He isn't bet calling worse hand unless he is marginal at best, so even if he's donking worse thinking you wont raise b/c of the flush, i dont see the value in a raise. I mean i personally think you lose here more often than not and def would not want to raise the river here at all. He prolly caps AK preflop, your played your hand like the nuts, and now he is donking. If he is in fact an expert, he realizes that he can fold all hands worse than AK if you fire the river AND that the pot is so big that you won't fold a single one of the hands you have repped thus far to a donk. So call the river.
|
|
#38
09-13-2007, 07:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
the pot is so big that you won't fold a single one of the hands you have repped thus far to a donk. [/ QUOTE ] The longer this thread goes, and the more sensible comments like this one that are posted, the more I want to cry, knowing the results.
|
|
#40
09-13-2007, 07:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: hand
[ QUOTE ]
so pbob folded? [/ QUOTE ] Hey, I didn't say that. By the way, Victor I think you summed up this thread way back when you wrote: [ QUOTE ] pbob, this hand really isnt hard to play. you call the river. simple. the hand is still interesting tho, bc im very curious what co had. [/ QUOTE ] Every word of that is an 'amen.' OK, I'm going back to my micro games.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
