![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
i wouldn't. [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] not sure if you planned on posting the rest of the hand, but im interested in seeing how it played out. [/ QUOTE ] Pretty anticlimactic. Flop came Q rag rag, bet, call, fold. Turn ace, bet, call. River Q, bet, fold. I win w/o showdown. [/ QUOTE ] can't argue with results! |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I put button on range of - 22+,A2s+,K5s+,Q7s+,J9s+,T9s,A2o+,K7o+,Q8o+,J9o+ [/ QUOTE ] To 3 bet the button with?? This seems like a bit of a stretch considering that there's no read on the button and no way to know if he's aware of how loose MP3 is.. you really think the button is 3-betting with K7 or A2??? I'd think being OOP you'd want to error on the side of caution and put him on a PP, probably 7's or higher or ATs or better.. in which case we can't beat any of those and are really just askin' to get ourselves trapped.. I think capping with A rag OOP is a "leak" in anyone's game.. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm with the lay it down PF crowd.
If this game is as good as you claim it is your gonna get more than one oppurtunity to make this kind of play. (i.e. buttion, CO) And we still don't really have a read on the button. All we know is that doesn't seem to respect the maniac. He could be a calling station for all we know. I want a better read on both players both players before I try something like this. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd like it more if the maniac is the 3 bettor. With the button being the re-raiser I like it alot less. I just think you're going to miss the flop and get two calls on the flop OOP with no idea where you stand. But then again you're better than I am.
|
![]() |
|
|