![]() |
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
St Louis rushing...
Game by Game: 89, 108, 101, 42, 77, 105, 109, 200, 75, 6, 138, 49, 108, 178, 44 |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shaping up to be another easy week, lets hope we don't get any curveball questions for 4 and 5.
|
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Shaping up to be another easy week, lets hope we don't get any curveball questions for 4 and 5. [/ QUOTE ] *knock on wood, way to jinx us. Today's question is gonna be the kickoff thing again just because you said that. Also, everyone thought that GB/BAL over/under was a gimme and that was the one question that screwed just about everyone over. Bad sign for StL and the players involved, but evidently both of St. Louis' RBs have a touch of the flu and have had trouble practicing this week. So it looks even more like the under on rushing yards was the correct play. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Seems they moved the Sunday screwup to Saturday.
Today's question.. nada |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Seems they moved the Sunday screwup to Saturday. Today's question.. nada [/ QUOTE ] I blame Sniper and his comment about how easy this week is gonna be. Same thing as when the commentator mentions a quarterback's streak of passes without an interception and on the very next play he throws a pick. As soon as Sniper said this was an easy week something had to go wrong and make it more difficult... |
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I blame Sniper and his comment about how easy this week is gonna be. [/ QUOTE ] So we spay/neuter Sniper? |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
So we spay/neuter Sniper? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's a bit extreme, but if it winds up costing me $50, some kind of retribution will be in order...
|
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
|
VIP support email me question 4 it is:
4)Dallas will score less than or equal to three (3) touchdowns? |
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
VIP support email me question 4 it is: 4)Dallas will score less than or equal to three (3) touchdowns? [/ QUOTE ] I don't know what's worse, having no question, or having this question. 3 TDs is a lot in the NFL today, but Dallas should pretty much dominate them. Two other times Dallas was a double digit favorite and they scored 30+ both times. Against Philly earlier this year they scored 33 points (3TDs) and against Arizona they scored 34 points (4 TDs, 1 was defensive). Dallas scores 21 pts/game. St. Louis gives up 28 points/game. Supposedly Rams will be airing it out in the last game which should stretch the game out a bit and give more time to score. Also, more likely to have turnovers and easy TDs. The O/U for this game is 43.5 and Dallas is basically a 13 point favorite. So we're looking at a 28 to 16 type of score according to that. On ESPN.com, the Scouts Inc. guys predict a score of 28-10. Tough question, gonna have to think this out. And I'm a Redskins fan and it will be awfully awkward to be rooting for the Cowboys to run up the score against the Rams. The last couple Monday night games were laughers that had the winning team scoring a lot. The problem I have is the fact that Dallas is equally likely to dominate this game defensively and win 17 to 3 as they are to dominate this game all around and wind up winning 35 to 17. |
![]() |
|
|