AVERAGE SPEED VIII: GAME THREAD

[Our House]

Oh, I almost forgot...

:::WOLFDAR TEST:::

Bram, what's my role this game?

[chuckleslovakian]

be back later, as for now BobO

[xorbie]

yeah ok so some of tokyo!!s posts i thought were OH posts. you guys need to do something about the avatar situation there. scratch OH off the list right now.

worthless
thebram
tokyo!!
wdc
chuckles
mcnutty

let's roll.

[soah]

OK, here's a quick summary of bobo's posts so far:

- chuckles is a wolf, because chuckles voted bobo randomly at the start of the game

- I am a wolf, because I said bobo might be a wolf, yet voted for someone else who I said might be a wolf

- Magra is a wolf, because he said that he thinks that if I'm a wolf, then bobo is a wolf too

If bobo isn't a wolf, then he is a really, really terrible villager. And I'm really not sure which.

Since bobo and patton have been two of the strongest supporters of a chuckles lynch, I'm thinking that I will definitely not be voting chuckles in the near future. In a few days, that might change, as he's definitely not on my villagery list right now (somewhere on the "unknown" list).

Another observation from looking through today's posts again is that Horn is creeping onto the wolfy list, although there's not really anything specific I can point at.

[BobOjedaFan]

[ QUOTE ]
OK, here's a quick summary of bobo's posts so far:

- chuckles is a wolf, because chuckles voted bobo randomly at the start of the game

- I am a wolf, because I said bobo might be a wolf, yet voted for someone else who I said might be a wolf

- Magra is a wolf, because he said that he thinks that if I'm a wolf, then bobo is a wolf too

If bobo isn't a wolf, then he is a really, really terrible villager. And I'm really not sure which.

Since bobo and patton have been two of the strongest supporters of a chuckles lynch, I'm thinking that I will definitely not be voting chuckles in the near future. In a few days, that might change, as he's definitely not on my villagery list right now (somewhere on the "unknown" list).

Another observation from looking through today's posts again is that Horn is creeping onto the wolfy list, although there's not really anything specific I can point at.

[/ QUOTE ]


You are WRONG about all 3 of my reasons for the 3 of you being Wolves!. JESUS CHRIST!!!

Chuckles is a wolf because I voted for him all Day 1, and Shortline was killed to set me up. Only reason to set me up is to either protect Chuckles or make me go insane.

You are a wolf because you stated as fact I am a wolf. That should supercede you 'thinking' someone else was a wolf, you should have been voting for me.

Magra is a wolf because he said either both of us are villagers, or both of us are wolves. This is an incredibly stupid comment and probably something Magra just posted to appeart helpful.

I am an awesome villager, you are an obvious wolf.

[BobOjedaFan]

[ QUOTE ]
OK, here's a quick summary of bobo's posts so far:

- chuckles is a wolf, because chuckles voted bobo randomly at the start of the game

- I am a wolf, because I said bobo might be a wolf, yet voted for someone else who I said might be a wolf

- Magra is a wolf, because he said that he thinks that if I'm a wolf, then bobo is a wolf too

If bobo isn't a wolf, then he is a really, really terrible villager. And I'm really not sure which.

Since bobo and patton have been two of the strongest supporters of a chuckles lynch, I'm thinking that I will definitely not be voting chuckles in the near future. In a few days, that might change, as he's definitely not on my villagery list right now (somewhere on the "unknown" list).

Another observation from looking through today's posts again is that Horn is creeping onto the wolfy list, although there's not really anything specific I can point at.

[/ QUOTE ]

Patton wanted Chuckles because Patton was a DAY 1 SACRAFICE once the voting got hot. That's why you yourself put the axe on him. I'm not even sure why I'm arguing with you since you obviously know this and I will not convince you to vote for your partners.

[durron597]

[0] aaronk56 voted for Tokyo!!
[1] BobOjedaFan voted for chuckleslovakian
[1] chuckleslovakian voted for BobOjedaFan
[0] dmk
[0] fnord_too
[0] hornacek voted for luckayluck
[5] luckayluck voted for Nicholasp27
[0] magra voted for luckayluck
[0] McNutty
[0] mdorand voted for luckayluck
[1] nicholasp27
[0] our house voted for luckayluck
[0] ScottHoward
[0] soah voted for thebram
[1] thebram voted for Tokyo!!
[3] tokyo!! voted for wdcbooks
[1] wdcbooks
[1] worthless voted for luckayluck
[0] wmonfor voted for Tokyo!!
[0] xorbie voted for worthless
[0] zurvan voted for wdcbooks

[BobOjedaFan]

I really don't understand how this village can be so dumb. We have 3 obvious wolves and no one is voting any of them.

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
DAY 1 SACRAFICE

[/ QUOTE ]

SACRAFICE

[LuckayLuck]

sigh...
it's true that the sticky should be followed to the letter in terms of villager suggestions on how to play. I thought I'd followed it to the letter, but now it looks bad for me.

Okay, so it's time for the defense I guess. Now the tricky part about defense is that apparently I should only defend when I'm on the verge of being lynched but not before [as I defended my vote earlier with no danger of being lynched]. So I did my research this time, figured out that I've got the only bandwagon-vote going, and that one or two people who are on me may not be back to change their votes, so I have to make my move now.

Gonna keep it simple and tell it exactly as it is!

I'm currently being sole bandwagon-voted for eviction from: Hornacek, Magra, Mdorand, Our House, Worthless.

It seems like the reasons for why people are voting for me is because I voted for nicholasp27, who is a "safe vote" because he can't vote for me. Well, sure. I guess. For me, I'll repeat my reasoning: there was very little done to stop patton4 from being voted out on Day 1, and he could have easily been prevented from being voted out. It leads me to believe that the wolves were missing communication from at least one if not two people to coordinate some non-suspicious effort. Which is why I strongly voted for nicholas.

But anyways...
I -do- honestly think that I've given off more villager tells then not. I guess another matter of suspicion is my indecisiveness in day 1 in switching votes 3 times. Explanation!

My first vote and one-liner was Hornacek. I voted him because he voted for me. No further explanation there...
I then voted for patton4 because he'd voted for me also. And he had posted a funny looking picture which looked highly wolfy-suspicious to me. Some sort of comment in the werewolf faq had a mention that people who post a lot of random stuff / pics etc are wolves!

Only later from reading all the noob posts (and yeah, admittedly, I'm a noob) was I jarred to action to make my post of introduction. I then voted for chuckles, straightforwardly because he was #2 on the lynch list and I thought patton was more innocent then chucks.

But then, I went back on myself and thought "hey...chuckles isn't that suspicious. Lemme vote for soah instead, he has some votes on him." But shortly after posting that I realized that I hadn't read his stuff yet, I read it, felt a moment of dread as I believed him even less suspicious than the guy I just changed my vote off of, and then decided "oh man...I better just stick to tradition and vote bobo." (who was somewhat suspicious in his lack of posting, he's usually supposed to be loud!)

Okay...that brings us up to today. Perhaps soah said it best:

[ QUOTE ]
Here are a couple of possibilities, some of which are a bit far-fetched... but they are food for thought:

...

* luckay and McNutty are wolves, and this entire charade was setup to clear them. Quite frankly I feel silly even suggesting this because it seems highly unlikely, but I'm bringing it up anyway for the sake of completeness. This would be very FPS and it would be leaving the noobs at a disadvantage from the start, and I doubt they would try such a risky move, but it's possible. But for now I will assume that this is not the case, and I will not be voting McNutty or luckay unless their next few days are terrible. I suppose this also should be applied to chuckles.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not capable of doing such FPS while keeping my story clean, and I know it's clean because I haven't planned any of it. And if I was a wolf during my first game I would've held off on my vote until I'd consulted with my fellow wolves, and I certainly wouldn't have brought about so much suspicion on myself by changing votes 3 times during the first day. (Unless, of course, I'm actually thinking on a 2nd level because my explanation has thus far all been 1st level. But take my word for it, I haven't FPS'd yet!)


In summary
I've been playing very straightforwardly. There's at least 1 vote stuck on me (Hornacek) who had to take off for the night. There's been no established second bandwagon yet, so I need to make my move and attempt to clear myself onto someone else now. The basis of my argument for not voting me from now is going to be: "I'm not good enough to pull what I just explained above and actually did in days 1-2 as a republican, so you should not vote for me." Bona-fide villager material here, guys!


I almost feel like I'm not qualified enough to start my own bandwagon, but there hasn't been another one really created yet, just a list of suspects with nobody really quite starting the vote. Uhhh...at this point I think that soah's/xorbie's views have a lot of stock to them. Good theories and etc.


I will vote for worthless.

And I'll actually add good reasons why...

#1) He's on the lucky bandwagon right now. I really believe that it's a wolfgang on me.
#2) He made this post as his explanation of voting me:
[ QUOTE ]
i just went through all of lucky's posts in this thread and i'm really convinced he's a wolf at this point. he sounds just like i did as a noobie wolf and i think he would be a very solid lynch. his early vote of/change off of patton seems very wolfy as does his defense of his 1 word posts. he also seemed to just choose someone random in nichp to vote today and then defends it when questioned. overall very wolfy and who i am confident enough to put my vote on for now.

lucky

[/ QUOTE ]
Of course I'm biased but I honestly don't think my actions and relative newbie status qualify me for such certainty in pointing the finger and acucsing 'wolf.'