banging chicks from myspace.com

[Klompy]

[ QUOTE ]
BEP,

[ QUOTE ]
Brian I know you are discouraged by your most recent affair, but I hope you continue in the same manner for great lengths of time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks bro. Yeah, I am actually very discouraged. I think I am gonna lay off the MySpace for a while - it isn't healthy for me to be persuing 90% of my women through there, anyways. Like you said, MySpace is an excellent supplemental tool. I plan on diving into real world "insides?" tomorrow.

-Brian

[/ QUOTE ]

does this mean there will be a new thread about your real life dating adventures?

[Tuco]

It's a rite of passage. You don't deserve to know if you don't read it.

Tuco.

[ridonkulous]

[ QUOTE ]
I think I am gonna lay off the MySpace for a while

[/ QUOTE ]

This is the first time I have ever cried, after reading something on the internet.

[Brian]

[ QUOTE ]
does this mean there will be a new thread about your real life dating adventures?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hah, no, I think that would be a little egotistical of me to assume you guys care enough, and I doubt I could keep this sort of momentum up anyways, especially w/o having copy+pastes and pics to work with.

[ QUOTE ]
This is the first time I have ever cried, after reading something on the internet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hah! Well I'm just gonna cut the MySpace back, it's not like I'm really making progress there anyways. I'll probably just be slightly more selective instead of sending every piece of trash I see some customized msg and usually not get a response anyways.

Theres plenty of incoming trip reports anyways, but I'll do what must be done (I have StayPuft's AIM) if the thread starts to die again.

-Brian

[Wilco666]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
does this mean there will be a new thread about your real life dating adventures?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hah, no, I think that would be a little egotistical of me to assume you guys care enough

[/ QUOTE ]

Long-time lurker in this thread. First post to state that I do care.

[delta k]

good or bad

" i was looking over your profile and while you're not very hot it's awesome you like _________ because I do too. "

i'm going to say it's good to criticize their looks from the get-go, that way i can say they are waaaaaaay better looking in real life. although it's doubtful i'd get to real life with a starter like this, huh?

[Lazy Meatball]

[ QUOTE ]

" i was looking over your profile and while you're not very hot it's awesome you like _________ because I do too. "


[/ QUOTE ]

common sense says horrible. Unless there is some sort of 20th level thinking going on, I think this would only work if you were already a great looking guy, and this was directed towards a good looking chick.

[Brian]

[ QUOTE ]
although it's doubtful i'd get to real life with a starter like this, huh?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all, though I would say it greatly depends upon how attractive the girl is you sent this to. If the girl is remotely attractive and knows it, or at least thinks she is attractive, then this is a good opener. If you sent this to StayPuft tho, she'd just block you. :'( Gotta coddle the beasts a bit.

-Brian

[EDIT]: To add, I think you'll get a lot more responses w/o being negative, but the responses that you do get with this will almost always lead somewhere if you follow-up well.

[delta k]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

" i was looking over your profile and while you're not very hot it's awesome you like _________ because I do too. "


[/ QUOTE ]

common sense says horrible. Unless there is some sort of 20th level thinking going on, I think this would only work if you were already a great looking guy, and this was directed towards a good looking chick.

[/ QUOTE ]

i feel like this makes it gold, since it's not suppose to be like that. instead of "omg lol u so hott" to get this would make me different. plus since i'm only interested in hot chicks she'd know it was a joke.

[Lazy Meatball]

yes, very target dependant. for those of targeting BJ's from low self esteem SIFs, this has no chance, but for those of you with higher limit game plus credentials, this could have a lower response efficiency, but higher probabbility with those that do respond.