![]() |
|
#361
|
|||
|
|||
|
1 sec, who is on the panel?
|
|
#362
|
|||
|
|||
|
WTF is going on in this thread now?
Cliff notes anyone? |
|
#363
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
1 sec, who is on the panel? [/ QUOTE ] El Diablo, Nick B. (long time poster - I trust his opinion), and either Dean if he replies to PM or Gildwulf. But the panel is not necessary if you will just concede that you have not satisfied the winning criterion as I quoted from your previous post, which is my belief. We can just call it a tie or wait for more information. |
|
#364
|
|||
|
|||
|
For ease of reference, these are the three sets of data.
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 Good2CU's PT shot http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...age=0&vc=1 Highstakes.nu's data http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...5/good2cu2.jpg Unknown dataminer's data |
|
#365
|
|||
|
|||
|
I believe I have proof.
|
|
#366
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP,
The panel will decide based on this statement: "If the panel thinks that the evidence is not strong enough to conclusively award one side the win, I have no problem calling it a tie." and acceptance: "I agree." We understand that both of you will have different opinions regarding what is a satisfactory level of proof. Please feel free to elaborate on that in your argument posts and it will be taken into account in the decision-making. The panel will decide whether or not there is enough evidence to make a decision about the core element of the bet - whether or not g2c won that amount. |
|
#367
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I believe I have proof. [/ QUOTE ] OK. Then I will write my post of my evidence. Are we just posting them in this thread? |
|
#368
|
|||
|
|||
|
Rolen,
Please summarize what those three sets of data show and how they relate to prove your case. |
|
#369
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm a donk, deleted
Lori |
|
#370
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cliff notes:
Good2cu was doing well in some high stakes cash games. People started sweating him and after a while he lot a couple of big pots and people were speculating that he was down money. He posted in this thread that he did not lose money and was, in fact, up 10k. Posters The Worst Player and Rolen decided to make a bet on whether he was truely up 10k or not. The data they have recieved from dataminers has been inconistant and not satisfactory to award either poster the bet. A 3rd party unbiased panel (headed by El D) is now being set up in order to determine who is the winner of the bet. |
![]() |
|
|