![]() |
|
#351
|
|||
|
|||
|
In other news, my stars have gone!!
|
|
#352
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I nominate Dean as a second of three or five person panel. [/ QUOTE ] i'll do it |
|
#353
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
If the panel thinks that the evidence is not strong enough to conclusively award one side the win, I have no problem calling it a tie. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. And I would rather call it a tie than take your money on evidence weaker than what we originally stated which was two identical data sets. Currently my evidence is largely one data set and a bunch of PMs which I understand most likely cannot satisfy the criterion we established. However, I don't think that you have satisfied the criterion either, so my current position is that it is currently a tie. In fact, if you agree with that assessment, that neither of us has two identical data sets proving his results, then I'm willing to just call it a tie and save the panel time. |
|
#354
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
In other news, my stars have gone!! [/ QUOTE ] Congrats. I can only assume it was related to the way you have conducted yourself in this thread. Nice job not taking the bait of the trolls. |
|
#355
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
The bet is on: "strong enough to conclusively award one side the win" "I agree." The panel will decide whether there is enough evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, to award the bet. |
|
#356
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gildwulf : No problem with you on panel
TWP : I want these guys to decide if either of us has proof ElD : That's correct |
|
#357
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
Longtime 2+2er Nick B has agreed to be on the panel. He is very trustworthy and can be unbiased here. BTW, Nick has followed this thread and noticed that Rolen's ** was from over a year ago, so based on Rolen not being a tard here removed them. However, he does not know Rolen and has no stake/bias in either side winning. He is just as much of an argumentative prick as me. I have IM'd Dean. If he gets back to me within the next 20 minutes or so, he is the third member. Otherwise, Gild is. Gild, when did your name get capitalized? Also, PM me your IM, thx. |
|
#358
|
|||
|
|||
|
El D: please keep in mind that in this post Rolen stated, and I agreed, that we needed "two identical PT stats for the session from two sources to confirm either way". That is the standard for deciding the bet.
|
|
#359
|
|||
|
|||
|
TWP, Rolen:
Please post in a single post a summary of your case and evidence backing up your statements. If you cite info in this thread, don't bother linking to the posts, but please do quote stuff you reference. |
|
#360
|
|||
|
|||
|
El D: Please confirm that you are aware of the proper standard for deciding.
Rolen: In order to potentially save time, please state that you believe you have satisfied the standard for deciding, as quoted in your previous post. |
![]() |
|
|