![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: My Sharkscope stats are off by: | |||
| Results, please |
|
5 | 8.20% |
| 0 % |
|
35 | 57.38% |
| 1-3 % |
|
13 | 21.31% |
| 4-6 % |
|
2 | 3.28% |
| > 6 % |
|
6 | 9.84% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#341
|
|||
|
|||
|
Calling this a "cover-up" understates its importance.
In fact, the denials by the management of the cheating would have prevented the victims from recovering money, had not additional evidence leaked out. Thus, those denials themselves constituted an attempt by management to defraud the victims, entirely independent of their function as a "cover-up". To understand my point, we can distinguish four main ways in which Absolute behaved wrongly: 1. First, that individual players were cheated at their website. 2. Second, that Absolute lied about this in order to protect their reputation. 3. Third, that by lying about it, Absolute attempted to prevent the victims from being compensated. 4. Finally, that Absolute management themselves may have participated in the theft/cheating in (1). The first issue alone has very limited relevance either to Absolute or to online poker: at most a few million dollars. The fourth issue is more serious, but its actual significance is still small if it were only "a few bad apples" doing the cheating. The second issue is the "cover-up" that I think you were alluding to; that is serious but also understandable. Companies often try to put themselves in the best light. But it is the third issue, denial of reimbursement, whose significance I think you underestimate. The denials of the cheating could not have been the work of a few "bad apples": these were carefully drafted press releases that must have received approval at all levels of management and security. There is no "reputational defense" available here as there was to the second issue above: management apparently intentionally and knowingly attempted to defraud the victims by the fact of their denials of the cheating. So as to the initial cheating: the "only a few bad-apples" defense can work for Absolute. As to the cover-up per se, the "we are only trying to protect our reputation" could work. But the knowing denial of cheating and of reimbursement of the victims, over a long period of time in public pronouncements by the management and by security, indicates active complicity in management in theft (denying reimbursement) and as such is distinguishable from, and more serious than, a mere "cover-up." [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] http://www.pocketfives.com/0BE7AAF6-...13DA8D83A.aspx I received a phone call late last night from someone in the UB/AP system.... " What if the latest release from AP is all that they can give you?" "Are the people causing the most uproar over this going to risk killing online poker just to hang someone?" [/ QUOTE ] Let me put it this way, Tom/AJ/whomever, since I know you're reading this: multiple senior executives at a company *blatantly* cheat their customers, cover it up four times by my count (not just the fact it was them, but the fact that it ever occurred), and then ask whether I'd personally be satisfied with coverup #5 in order to keep the heat off the game as a whole. What the [censored] am I supposed to do here, guys? You tell me. You're presumably not completely braindead, so let me know at which point I'm supposed to stop calling for blood when I know you still have anything to do with operational control of the company holding lots of people's money. In this happy fun regulation-free ancap paradise world online poker belongs in, nobody's going to jail, but do you think you can possibly see your way around to my side of things, the one where this suggestion you're making is pretty [censored] hilarious? [/ QUOTE ] |
|
#342
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() by admo [/ QUOTE ] these need more love imo |
|
#343
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, but what kind of last name is Tom? Probably just one truncate from something else? [/ QUOTE ] I personally knew someone with the last name "Tom" and it wasn't a truncation or anything. It's a real last name, odd as it may look. |
|
#344
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#345
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] this guy was in aruba 2 weeks ago for the UB tournament decked out in UB gear the entire time. [/ QUOTE ] Can anyone who has met Scott Tom tell us if this is him? [/ QUOTE ] why not ask the girl in pic about the name of the guy? [/ QUOTE ] Just got this email: "John Ethans - a Customer service manager" |
|
#346
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone want to contact his fellow alumnist: personal info [/ QUOTE ] this should be addressed directly to adanthar or someone else who has been directly involved |
|
#347
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
I think you're getting overly bitchy about what seems like a pretty straightforward question. I'm fairly ignorant of the law, particularly when applied to tribal gaming commissions, and there are some actual lawyers here, obviously, that might know these things better than I. I guess I'm just puzzled about what further work along these channels is going to accomplish. (EDIT: That is, if talking to police is going to be a waste of time, then what isn't going to be a waste of time? If AP giving a full confession is the only way they go down at this point, then I think there are problems.) [/ QUOTE ] again, Nat and I do not have a monopoly on AP-related facts. You're 'anybody' - if you feel like it, go and get it done? |
|
#348
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone want to contact his fellow alumnist: personal info [/ QUOTE ] this should be addressed directly to adanthar or someone else who has been directly involved [/ QUOTE ] yeah seriously has anyone tried contacting the people on that list? |
|
#349
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
This - the question in the phone call you mention - is one of the most disturbing things I have read in these threads. [/ QUOTE ] QFT. They're digging a deeper hole with every word they utter. I won't be surprised if the "statement" (now about a full day overdue I think) will pose more questions than it answers and turns out to be just another stalling tactic. |
|
#350
|
|||
|
|||
|
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Anyone want to contact his fellow alumnist: Brown, xxxxx 728-xxxx 728-xxxx 708-xxxx [email protected] xxxxx Colorado [/ QUOTE ] this should be addressed directly to adanthar or someone else who has been directly involved [/ QUOTE ] Actually, no this [censored] shouldn't be posted at all, assuming his info is only getting posted because he went to freaking school with these guys. Posting that crap is beyond insane. |
![]() |
|
|