HSNL [censored] thread SEPTEMBER - Page 34

iplayscared · #**331** 09-26-2007, 12:30 AM

[ QUOTE ]
For everyone (myself included) that has ever been Grimmed.

[/ QUOTE ]

that has got to be [censored] altered in some way shape or form. if its not then ill just lol all night

Christophers · #**332** 09-26-2007, 12:43 AM

It isn't altered.

bigt439 · #**333** 09-26-2007, 02:04 AM

looking to get up to 15K on ub for party money from a credible poster...

ill send first, but if youre worried about my credibility, durrr, raptor, jman, apathy, etc. will all vouch for me.

pm me if interested.

KingDan · #**334** 09-26-2007, 03:03 AM

Looking to get some money off UB for stars or FTP
PM me (3k min)

Kirkrrr · #**335** 09-26-2007, 04:40 AM

So out of sheer curiousity combined with slight boredom I clicked, for the first time ever, at the Play Money tab on FT and now I'm just completely bewildered, and the source of my confusion is this: there are 300/600NL tables with everyone sitting on 600,000 in obviously play money chips but they seem fully rolled, and doesn't everyone start with 1,000 chips and if you bust you can request 1,000 more? So did these people seriously built 1,000 into 600,000+??! And if someone had the skill to do that, why wouldn't he just play .25/.50 or something? 5-tabling @ 5PTBB he would still earn $25/hr, which isn't much but still more than the majority of people actually make.

Kirk

PS. Okay, asked them and some of them have 20Mil+ bankrolls. [censored] sick.

riverboatking · #**336** 09-26-2007, 05:07 AM

[ QUOTE ]
It isn't altered.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dunno...i've played with grim and i dont think he plays anywhere near 47/43.

PoppinFresh · #**337** 09-26-2007, 05:34 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It isn't altered.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dunno...i've played with grim and i dont think he plays anywhere near 47/43.

[/ QUOTE ]

mikech · #**338** 09-26-2007, 05:37 AM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It isn't altered.

[/ QUOTE ]

i dunno...i've played with grim and i dont think he plays anywhere near 47/43.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]
NL ($50) (1-on-1)
NL ($20) (1-on-1)

PoppinFresh · #**339** 09-26-2007, 05:41 AM

Yeah I saw that it was hu, he plays significantly tighter than that vs. me, very possible he's just nitting it up though bc it's 5/10 and he's multitabling etc.

anyway pls let it be true

riverboatking · #**340** 09-26-2007, 06:58 AM

[ QUOTE ]
NL ($50) (1-on-1)
NL ($20) (1-on-1)

[/ QUOTE ]

ya i saw that it was HU.
the only time's i've played vs grim it was HU and he was super nitty/passive.
nowhere near 47/43.