Cheating in Online Poker

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
Cool. If he doesn't know what he's talking about then enlighten him (and the rest of people following this thread who agree with him). How is what he said incorrect?

[/ QUOTE ]

because multiaccounting ITT = entering two accounts in one donkament, which Clayton didn't actually do

hence, he doesn't even have the right definition

[ASPoker8]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No, thanks. I agree with ucla and others that there's no legitimate reason to have more than one account.

Sure, maybe Clayton never multi-accounted, but would he admit it if he had? Do we take him at his word simply because he's a good player and other 2+2ers think he's a good guy?

If you don't want people to think you might be cheating, don't multi-account. It's against the TOS for a reason. Many accounts sure make it a lot easier to cheat, don't you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

You have no clue what you're talking about

[/ QUOTE ]

Cool. If he doesn't know what he's talking about then enlighten him (and the rest of people following this thread who agree with him). How is what he said incorrect?

[/ QUOTE ]

Really?

Actually, just about no one agrees with him.

He is calling Clayton a multi-accounter and pretending like he has the right to judge him and "not feel sorry for him" and all this business, when in actuality, it appears he doesnt even know what multi-accounting is.

[Clayton]

[ QUOTE ]
Come on, Adam. If Clayton was multiaccounting, he's not going to just cough up the names he was doing it with. If he can open 6 accounts, I'm sure he could open more.

[/ QUOTE ]

[censored] you paul, this borders on slander. i've had enough.

i've been more than cooperative and helpful, but you crossed the line. diagf.

also have had enough of this thread. good day.

[MLG]

I'll trying pointing this out for the third time. Everybody is missing the point. Clayton isnt the issue whether or not he multi-accounted (he didnt}) isnt the issue. The issue is that its easy to set up those acocunts, people setting up those accounts go unreported. Therefore its easy for somebody who wants to multi-account to set up those accounts.

You can't just say, person X wont multi-account so we shouldnt care if he has multiple names. The point is nobody should get away with having multiple names for whatever the reason. because allowing that to happen allows multi-accounting to occur.

[CharlieDontSurf]

has anyone even attempted to clearly define a definition of multi-accounting for this threads purpose?

cuz it seems like everyone has a different view of what it entails.

[MLG]

definition: multi-accounting is the practice of one person entering more than one account in the same tournament.

[A_Junglen]

[ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Come on, Adam. If Clayton was multiaccounting, he's not going to just cough up the names he was doing it with. If he can open 6 accounts, I'm sure he could open more.

[/ QUOTE ]


burn the witches!

[/ QUOTE ]

For real.

Paranoid much?

Clayton is primarily a cash game player...he started learning mtt's like, a 2 month's ago. He gave you all his s/n's and reasons why (staking - yellowsub can confirm) and PS will investigate and he'll end up with his original s/n. He's never played with 2 screen names in the same tournament.


I hope you're happy.

[BigAlK]

[ QUOTE ]
because multiaccounting ITT = entering two accounts in one donkament, which Clayton didn't actually do

hence, he doesn't even have the right definition

[/ QUOTE ]

He said:

"Sure, maybe Clayton never multi-accounted ... "

That doesn't appear to be it.

[ASPoker8]

[ QUOTE ]
has anyone even attempted to clearly define a definition of multi-accounting for this threads purpose?

cuz it seems like everyone has a different view of what it entails.

[/ QUOTE ]

no.

Multi-accounting is entering more than one account in a tournament.

[A_Junglen]

[ QUOTE ]

also have had enough of this thread. good day.

[/ QUOTE ]