Election! - The Game Thread

[Boiler_bd]

[ QUOTE ]

When I see something that sticks out like your post did, I'm going to point it out.

Why so defensive?

[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly the wolves are looking to stick out as much as possible. Good catch. It doesn't happen all the time and no seer/wolf thinks it is good strategy to repeat something like it is new that has already been discussed.

I am being defensive because your argument that it was wolfy to post what I did is just that bad.

I'm also in a bad mood for some reason (see my reponse to bram yesterday). I still want to hit him in the face with a shovel. 007 - seriously wtf.

[BluffBlank]

vote traz

[ScottHoward]

all:
ive completed my non support list. it contains 9 wolves (and probably 2 seers 8-) ). im pretty sure one of jeremy/xorb is a villager. if xorb is a wolf, jeremy is almost certainly a villager, as i don’t think a wolf would call out another wolfs list discrepancy like jeremy did of xorbs.

traz is moving up my nonsupport list. his thoughts about not wanting too many people getting votes seems counter intuitive. I would think we want to be in a position later that we can elect anybody we want, this would mean everybody would need a vote asap. further, we need to be sure to elect 9 different players in the first 3 days (or can we do 12 in 4? whichever).

heres a suggestion: we use another word “fire” (to keep to keep it simple), instead of our normal “lynch”. we all play like a normal game using fire and when we get to a majority, whoever the electorate is , they must send our “fire” candidate to the senate. this removes the worry about electing wolves. whichever elected person doesn’t follow the plan, we lynch the next day.
somebody can keep track of the “fire”s. currently we would need 17. (of course, we can go by time and monitor ourselves, say 8pm deadline for fires?)

again, imo we need as many people as possible getting votes, and if we use my suggestion above, its definitely the right thing to do. we should have started the game like this, we would have a lot more info.

i wont be adding to my support list, as it is kinda moot at this point. those are the three people i will be voting from though.

in case we go along with it, fire bram
nonsupport list:
xorb/ jeremy
bram
dmk
zurv
traz
valenzuela
voj
chuck
cpfb
econophile
stephenh

support list:
mets
shorty
books

[ScottHoward]

8-) = [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[Iron_Yuppie]

My villager guesses:
valenzuela
soah
clown
fnord
luckay
lastchance
bram
spook
boiler - best villager guess
jeremy - best villager guess, although I'm a bit concerned that a lot a good players seem to think jeremy is wolfy

Wolf guesses:

stephen h
dmk
iron
chuck
econo
fcbl - Best wolf guess

If elected, I will push for one of those on my wolf list, and will not vote for those on my villager list.

Someone (shorty, I think) said that wolves on the electorate will not lynch fellow wolves. With 9 wolves, I think this is very wrong.

[ScottHoward]

ok wtf is everybody?
im outty in 10 minutes or so
im such a hypocrite

[shortline99]

i don't like how the votes are going. they worry me greatly.

[ScottHoward]

[ QUOTE ]
wtf is balony

[/ QUOTE ]
its a lunch meat, like solahmy

[ScottHoward]

[ QUOTE ]
i don't like how the votes are going. they worry me greatly.

[/ QUOTE ]
if we use the scotthoward plan, votes are irrelevant pretty much.
lets just fire somebody, then let the electorate vote them out.

[shortline99]

[ QUOTE ]
vote traz

[/ QUOTE ]
puke everywhere