I own mike mautsow

[Diamond Lie]

It has him at + 3,625

[TheWorstPlayer]

Which 9 levels is this from? It should only be from 25/50, 50/100, and 200/400.

[jcg2005]

This is all time, as i have only had pt for a short time, i highlighted the sessions i had for good2cu on 1/2. This means the 3,625 is not the total for that day. I can filter them if someone lets me know how/what to filter.

[TheWorstPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
This is all time, as i have only had pt for a short time, i highlighted the sessions i had for good2cu on 1/2. This means the 3,625 is not the total for that day. I can filter them if someone lets me know how/what to filter.

[/ QUOTE ]
Go to the Preferences page (last page in PT) and click "Specific date" at the top left. Put in 1/2/2007 for the date. Then on the right, click only the games 25/50 NL and higher. Then on the "Session notes" page, click the little "p" at the very top-left (just above the column "Level"). If you can post a screen shot of the little screen that pops up then, that would be perfect! Thanks for helping, man!

[jcg2005]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is all time, as i have only had pt for a short time, i highlighted the sessions i had for good2cu on 1/2. This means the 3,625 is not the total for that day. I can filter them if someone lets me know how/what to filter.

[/ QUOTE ]
Go to the Preferences page (last page in PT) and click "Specific date" at the top left. Put in 1/2/2007 for the date. Then on the right, click only the games 25/50 NL and higher. Then on the "Session notes" page, click the little "p" at the very top-left (just above the column "Level"). If you can post a screen shot of the little screen that pops up then, that would be perfect! Thanks for helping, man!

[/ QUOTE ]

[React1oN]

Why is this thread still going on.

[TheWorstPlayer]

Highstakes data mining: +26K @ 50/100 (??? hands - 1261 hands 50/100+)
Good2cu: +36K @ 50/100 (842 hands - 1254 hands 50/100+)
jcg data mining: +30K @ 50/100 (786 hands - 1199 hands 50/100+)

So everyone's the same at 200/400. We only have data from g2cu at 25/50 but no one is really disputing those stats. Highstakes, can you please tell us how many hands you have at 50/100, and double check that your results are correct?

We are getting very close here, thank you very much jcg.


"Why is this thread still going on?" Because I want my 1K.

[Rolen]

Game over TWP, here's why.

There is a difference between the second dataminer (jcq) and the first (highstakes) in 50/100 hands. This is bad for me as I need two correlating sets of data to win the bet.

However.

Jcq has not datamined HU tables. If you add up all the 50/100 sessions in highstakes' data that were 6max they come to 477 minutes (7.95 hours) and +$30009. In other words, they are indentical to the second dataminers. Since they are indentical to the nearest minute and the nearest dollar, it is unquestionable that they are both accurate.

Seeing as it's been proven that highstakes' data is accurate, there is no reason to doubt the validity of his HU sessions data, which come out as -$4050.

Add this to either dataminer's 50/100 6max stats and the 200/400 that everyone agrees on, and the only missing element is the 25/50. Since, as you say, 'no one is really disputing these stats', add them all up and the total figure is...

...- $52326 (everyone's 200/400 stats) + $30009 (both dataminer's 6max 50/100 stats) - $4050 (highstakes' HU 50/100 stats) + $26204 (G2CU's 25/50 stats) = -$343.

Ship the 1K.

[TheWorstPlayer]

I do doubt the validity of the HU results. BR numbers do not lie. And the second data miner has fewer 50/100 hands than g2cu. How do you account for that? Similar to the 'missing 7 hands' it doesn't make sense and needs an explanation.

[bigshowmack]

You guys are both retarded. You need to call the bet a push due to lack of complete undisputable data that you both agree to be accurate and just let this thread die.