Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #321  
Old 09-21-2006, 10:20 AM
Mr.K Mr.K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Munching on Champion\'s Chips
Posts: 2,360
Default Re: Online gambling to be attached to defense bill???- article Uh oh!!

Whatever day of the week it is today update:

CongressDaily is reporting that negotiations on the DoD Authorization have stalled, and that no action in the House is expected until next week. The article also contains a very interesting tidbit about other unresolved issues beyond the prayer matter, which I think we should all take as a warning that whatever the conference report might look like right now -- it remains subject to change, and is thus still a possibility to carry the Leach bill as a rider. Here's what the article had to say:

"As House and Senate Armed Services leaders struggled Wednesday to find common ground on lingering issues in their versions of the FY07 defense authorization bill, House Republicans said it appeared lawmakers would push a final vote on the measure into next week.

Delaying the defense authorization vote, which was expected in the House today, leaves Congress with a full schedule of national security issues to consider in the dwindling number of days before lawmakers leave town for the mid-term congressional elections. Other business on tap next week includes the FY07 Defense appropriations conference report, legislation authorizing military tribunals, and the warrantless surveillance bill.

By Wednesday evening, House Armed Services Chairman Hunter and Senate Armed Services Chairman Warner remained in negotiations over language in the House-passed defense authorization bill that would allow military chaplains to pray in the name of Jesus Christ."

The article closes with the interesting tidbit I referenced earlier, coming from House Armed Services Committee Ranking Member Ike Skelton (D-MO):

"The chaplains issue remained the biggest roadblock to completing the conference, although House Armed Services ranking member Ike Skelton, D-Mo., stressed that other issues remained unresolved." (emphasis added)

So that's what I know... I'll try to post an update later today. Also worth knowing is this: the House and Senate appear to be melting down right now on every single issue remaining for consideration: defense appropriations, defense authorization, homeland security appropriations, border security, offshore drilling, tax & minimum wage (aka the "trifecta"), military tribunals, and NSA wiretapping. The way I understand things, on every single one of those issues there are major roadblocks to passing bills by Sept 29 (the generally accepted adjournment date). This is shocking to me, and it portends for a busy and confusing final week in which all kinds of crazy [censored] -- or nothing at all -- could happen. This much is certain, I'd bet the farm against Kyl's bill clearing the Senate on a standalone basis this week (e.g. via unanimous consent). As for attaching it to another bill, that's still an open question, and a particular threat for the omnibus appropriations bill later this year.
Reply With Quote
  #322  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:02 PM
S0meGuy S0meGuy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 417
Default Re: Online gambling to be attached to defense bill???- article Uh oh!!

Mr.K and Berge20,

Can't be said enough...thanks for your ongoing efforts in keeping us posted as things happen...it is greatly appreciated.

S0meGuy
Reply With Quote
  #323  
Old 09-21-2006, 01:41 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: Online gambling to be attached to defense bill???- article Uh oh!!

[ QUOTE ]
Whatever day of the week it is today update:

[/ QUOTE ]

I know the feeling.
Reply With Quote
  #324  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:23 PM
Jestocost Jestocost is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 96
Default Frist Fails?

From CongressDaily PM

Judiciary. Senate Majority Leader Frist's attempt to attach a rider to the defense authorization bill to crack down on the $12 billion online gambling industry has failed, according to a high-ranking House aide. Frist was seeking to add a scaled-down anti-gambling rider to a bill that negotiators intend to complete before next week's recess. In July, the House passed, 317-93, a comprehensive measure to ban most forms of online gambling, as supporters contended that this year represents the best opportunity to crack down on the industry because of the political fallout from the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal.
Abramoff was instrumental in helping defeat an Internet gambling ban on the House floor in 2000. But the House measure has stalled in the Senate because of opposition from unidentified senators sympathetic to gambling interests. Defense authorizers have been wary of attaching non-military provisions to the measure. Advocates for the gambling industry remain on guard, however, that other attempts to attach the provision could be made during a lame-duck session in November.
Reply With Quote
  #325  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:35 PM
antneye antneye is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 307
Default Re: Frist Fails?

[ QUOTE ]
From CongressDaily PM

Judiciary. Senate Majority Leader Frist's attempt to attach a rider to the defense authorization bill to crack down on the $12 billion online gambling industry has failed, according to a high-ranking House aide. Frist was seeking to add a scaled-down anti-gambling rider to a bill that negotiators intend to complete before next week's recess. In July, the House passed, 317-93, a comprehensive measure to ban most forms of online gambling, as supporters contended that this year represents the best opportunity to crack down on the industry because of the political fallout from the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal.
Abramoff was instrumental in helping defeat an Internet gambling ban on the House floor in 2000. But the House measure has stalled in the Senate because of opposition from unidentified senators sympathetic to gambling interests. Defense authorizers have been wary of attaching non-military provisions to the measure. Advocates for the gambling industry remain on guard, however, that other attempts to attach the provision could be made during a lame-duck session in November.

[/ QUOTE ]

We win the round, but the fight is not over.
Reply With Quote
  #326  
Old 09-21-2006, 03:50 PM
LesJ LesJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,003
Default Re: Frist Fails?

[ QUOTE ]
But the House measure has stalled in the Senate because of opposition from unidentified senators sympathetic to gambling interests

[/ QUOTE ]

Who are they referring to? What "gambling interests" are they sympathetic to? And will they be in the loop when Frist attempts to attach this to the budget later this year?

Les
Reply With Quote
  #327  
Old 09-21-2006, 04:26 PM
Dunkman Dunkman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bubbling FTs
Posts: 2,584
Default Re: Frist Fails?

[ QUOTE ]

Who are they referring to? What "gambling interests" are they sympathetic to? And will they be in the loop when Frist attempts to attach this to the budget later this year?

Les

[/ QUOTE ]

Well the casino industry is against banning online gambling (they'd like to cash in one day for one, also maybe they think people gambling online makes them more likely to come gamble in vegas.) Also, in the house bill, the horse racing industry didn't like the language.
Reply With Quote
  #328  
Old 09-21-2006, 06:55 PM
whangarei whangarei is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: I :heart: Stars
Posts: 857
Default Re: Frist Fails?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
From CongressDaily PM

Judiciary. Senate Majority Leader Frist's attempt to attach a rider to the defense authorization bill to crack down on the $12 billion online gambling industry has failed, according to a high-ranking House aide. Frist was seeking to add a scaled-down anti-gambling rider to a bill that negotiators intend to complete before next week's recess. In July, the House passed, 317-93, a comprehensive measure to ban most forms of online gambling, as supporters contended that this year represents the best opportunity to crack down on the industry because of the political fallout from the Jack Abramoff lobbying scandal.
Abramoff was instrumental in helping defeat an Internet gambling ban on the House floor in 2000. But the House measure has stalled in the Senate because of opposition from unidentified senators sympathetic to gambling interests. Defense authorizers have been wary of attaching non-military provisions to the measure. Advocates for the gambling industry remain on guard, however, that other attempts to attach the provision could be made during a lame-duck session in November.

[/ QUOTE ]

We win the round, but the fight is not over.

[/ QUOTE ]

Great news! Thanks Mr. K, Berge, & Co. Maybe the grassroots lobbying effort generated by this forum did some good. Now on to Round 2, which seems to be the Omnibus spending bill.
Reply With Quote
  #329  
Old 09-21-2006, 07:34 PM
Jack Bando Jack Bando is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: POG
Posts: 2,777
Default Re: Frist Fails?

More like round 3 (Round 1 was the holds, this was 2, but meh)

Berge/Mr K, how much does Reid being against a tack-on job help our cause?
Reply With Quote
  #330  
Old 09-21-2006, 08:53 PM
Mr.K Mr.K is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Munching on Champion\'s Chips
Posts: 2,360
Default Re: Frist Fails?

[ QUOTE ]
More like round 3 (Round 1 was the holds, this was 2, but meh)

Berge/Mr K, how much does Reid being against a tack-on job help our cause?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hard to say... I'll try to post on this more substantively later this week or weekend.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.