|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: From the BB I am losing PTBB/hand | |||
| I am making a profit (and am sure of that) |
   
|
1 | 3.57% |
| 0.00 - 0.05 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.05 - 0.10 |
  
|
4 | 14.29% |
| 0.10 - 0.15 |
  
|
6 | 21.43% |
| 0.15 - 0.20 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.20 - 0.25 |
  
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.25 - 0.30 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.30 - 0.35 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.35 - 0.40 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 0.40 - 0.45 |
|
2 | 7.14% |
| 0.45-0.50 |
|
0 | 0% |
| results only |
|
7 | 25.00% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#311
01-21-2007, 08:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
That is a good example. I can understand why you would not want it based on that example.
Luckily, we don't tend to see any intentional bending of the rules like that (in regard to this specific rule). Phil Simms needs to lose his voicebox already. 
|
|
#313
01-21-2007, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
[ QUOTE ]
pip has a purpose, wow. [/ QUOTE ] Those things overflow my pip [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
|
|
#314
01-21-2007, 08:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
Oh, good. Looks like the Pats will take the indoor 52-yard FG attempt instead of the 4th-and-6.
Edit: Or not. Indy seems to have caught on to NE's habit of running on 2nd-and-10 after a first down incompletion (something San Diego figured out after one or two drives).
|
|
#315
01-21-2007, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
Straight flush for Clonie lol
|
|
#316
01-21-2007, 08:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
clutch.
|
|
#318
01-21-2007, 08:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL AFC TITLE GAME pats @ COLTS ***
Wow...I can't believe it.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
