Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #291  
Old 03-19-2007, 08:37 PM
homnig homnig is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 99
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I have some ideas of why you do this, but I'm curious what the actual reasons are.

[/ QUOTE ]
Chip preservation. You have to fold to a 3-bet a lot of times.
C-betting OOP sucks. You are shallow enough that building a pot isn't that important

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting points.
What is your stnd line if a random MP player makes it 4X and it's folded to you utg?
What if 1 player calls his/her raise and the action comes to you?
What if 2 or more players call his/her raise and the action comes to you?

Also, I <3 pp. What ROI do you think a very good sng player (not talking about myself) could attain at the...
55 normals
55 speeds
109 normals
109 speeds
215 speeds
Reply With Quote
  #292  
Old 03-19-2007, 09:01 PM
shakyamuni shakyamuni is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: long gone...
Posts: 276
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
Chip preservation. You have to fold to a 3-bet a lot of times.
C-betting OOP sucks. You are shallow enough that building a pot isn't that important

[/ QUOTE ]

could you elaborate on the bold section - being shallow enough...
Reply With Quote
  #293  
Old 03-20-2007, 01:52 AM
Finnisher Finnisher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Åbo
Posts: 1,117
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

You would mod your cards so that a={2,3,4,5,6}, b={7,8,9,T}, c={J,Q,K,A}. You couldn't see suits. Your hole cards would be red if they were a pair, otherwise white. Community cards would use the same a,b,c-notation but not the pair-thing. Everyone else would see the cards normally.

Could you beat 6s, 16s, Party 109s? How many and which groups would you want to have the cards divided into? Other changes?
Reply With Quote
  #294  
Old 03-20-2007, 02:40 AM
MrTynKyn MrTynKyn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 238
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

Can you explain in a few words this chart recommended by you ?
chart
Reply With Quote
  #295  
Old 03-20-2007, 04:25 AM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

Pudge, in a 9 men SNG, let's say down to 5 people.
You are short stack, everybody has you covered, how many big blinds left should you wait to push with any 2?

And with 50%?
Reply With Quote
  #296  
Old 03-20-2007, 10:58 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]

What is your stnd line if a random MP player makes it 4X and it's folded to you utg?

[/ QUOTE ]
Call

[ QUOTE ]
What if 1 player calls his/her raise and the action comes to you?

[/ QUOTE ]
Call

[ QUOTE ]
What if 2 or more players call his/her raise and the action comes to you?

[/ QUOTE ]
Shove probably.
Also it depends if this is L1 or L2 or L3.
[ QUOTE ]

55 normals
55 speeds
109 normals
109 speeds
215 speeds

[/ QUOTE ]
15-20. The games are really horrible, once I start grinding on Party I should be able to give decent results.
Reply With Quote
  #297  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:01 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Chip preservation. You have to fold to a 3-bet a lot of times.
C-betting OOP sucks. You are shallow enough that building a pot isn't that important

[/ QUOTE ]

could you elaborate on the bold section - being shallow enough...

[/ QUOTE ]
In a SNG the deepest you will ever be is 75bbs. Yes there are weird spots were you double and another guy doubles and you have to play a pot legitimately deep, but that almost never happens.
If you limp AK you can still keep on betting until the other guy gets all in with his top pair because you are so shallow.
Reply With Quote
  #298  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:04 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
You would mod your cards so that a={2,3,4,5,6}, b={7,8,9,T}, c={J,Q,K,A}. You couldn't see suits. Your hole cards would be red if they were a pair, otherwise white. Community cards would use the same a,b,c-notation but not the pair-thing. Everyone else would see the cards normally.

Could you beat 6s, 16s, Party 109s? How many and which groups would you want to have the cards divided into? Other changes?

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm a little confused are you saying all the cards would be an A a B or C and if there was a pair they would be red?
What would happen if you had 22 on a 3344 board?
Would there be 6 red A's?
Reply With Quote
  #299  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:06 AM
StregaChess StregaChess is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Support Ron Paul for President
Posts: 1,096
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
Chip preservation. You have to fold to a 3-bet a lot of times.
C-betting OOP sucks. You are shallow enough that building a pot isn't that important

[/ QUOTE ]
Is the primary purpose of a c-bet to build the pot or take the pot with the c-bet?
Reply With Quote
  #300  
Old 03-20-2007, 11:08 AM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Black Kelly Holcomb
Posts: 13,713
Default Re: The Well: Pudge714

[ QUOTE ]
Btw what was crescent like? I know it's a rich private school unless I remember incorrectly. I've always wondered what a school like this is like compared to a normal public school.

[/ QUOTE ]
Missed this question the first time around.
Ya it was a private school. I really liked it, I guess I liked it enough that I was there for most of my academic career. The facilities are really nice, small classrooms, good teachers, all of that stuff was awesome. There were a lot of stupid administrative things that the school did and obviously it being all guys sucked. I think for me it was a much better choice than public school, but I can definitely see that it would not be beneficial for a lot of kids. Unfortunately I can't really compare it to a public high school because I never went to one.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.